• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

1984

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Yuck.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #12
      Stasiland: Stories from Behind the Berlin Wall: Anna Funder: 9780062077325: Amazon.com: Books

      Please read it.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by original PM View Post
        I can just see it - I stroll down to Chav Street to make sure the parents are getting the kids to school



        and get the tulip kicked out of me..
        It said neighbours, it's generally unlikely you'd live on Chav street.

        these people do not send their kids to school or in general follow the 'average expected citizen' route cos they don't give a toss


        some busy body knocking on their door isn't gonna change a thing.
        Truancy is a crime so they might out of fear of being reported (or being beaten to death, as SO would claim).


        In the older days, wouldn't parents on a street (one where all the kids play together and people actually know each other) go rounding up all the kids as part of the street community life? That seems a better model to me. Middle class people have fear of the pedo and don't talk to their neighbours of course, but they are rarely the truancy problem.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          In the older days, wouldn't parents on a street (one where all the kids play together and people actually know each other) go rounding up all the kids as part of the street community life? That seems a better model to me.
          Yes, and that is part of being a decent chappy or good neighbour, and it's entirely different to being an informer who goes around poking his nose into other people's business. Personally I think this kind of command from on high destroys that kind of community spirit rather than encouraging it.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #15
            That looks a really good book - gonna buy it. Thanks Mich.
            If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by eek View Post
              Its stupider than even that. If children don't want to be in school, they will just disrupt those that do want to be there. I don't want the great not interested disrupting my children's education.
              That's a really stupid argument. The majority of children don't want to be in school. The difference is that responsible parents take their kids to school despite fake illnesses, etc.
              Last edited by d000hg; 23 January 2014, 09:45.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Yes, and that is part of being a decent chappy or good neighbour, and it's entirely different to being an informer who goes around poking his nose into other people's business. Personally I think this kind of command from on high destroys that kind of community spirit rather than encouraging it.
                I agree. I'm not sure that "informing" is automatically a bad thing - in many circles reporting any crime is considered "informing" or "dobbing" and that's nonsense - but paying people to do it rather than letting them do it as a concerned citizen is bad however you cut it.

                Also - why do you need neighbours to report kids as truants? Schools know who is supposed to be there. They should contact the authorities IMO.
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Yes, and that is part of being a decent chappy or good neighbour, and it's entirely different to being an informer who goes around poking his nose into other people's business.
                  What he is advocating is exactly this - trying to get people in a community to keep an eye out for others in the community. Being a good neighbour (in certain areas) requires some kind of incentive, sadly.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
                    What he is advocating is exactly this - trying to get people in a community to keep an eye out for others in the community. Being a good neighbour (in certain areas) requires some kind of incentive, sadly.
                    No he isn't. He's advocating financial rewards for people who observe and then report on their neighbours; that amounts to setting up an informer network, and once that informer network is in place it's all to easy to abuse it for other things; social security fraud, tax avoidance and so on. I don't believe for one minute that illiberal modern day politicians and officials can be trusted with that kind of power.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
                      What he is advocating is exactly this - trying to get people in a community to keep an eye out for others in the community. Being a good neighbour (in certain areas) requires some kind of incentive, sadly.
                      He's advocating the expansion of the state. Whether you think that's good or bad is less important than recognising that that is it's true nature.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X