Originally posted by Platypus
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IR35 unfriendly wording
Collapse
X
-
Don't the reviews happen before the contract is accepted? Therefore the actual working practices will not be known at that point. -
No. If the contract is worded such that it is clear that you are an employee, then there is no wriggle room - you are an employee and need to be inside IR35.Originally posted by Platypus View PostThis being the case, doesn't that render all contract review services utterly pointless?
If the contract is worded such that there is ambiguity, or is worded so that it is clear that there is no intention for you to be an employee, then there is room to argue one way or the other, which is where the IR35 arguments happen.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment