Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
M1
Collapse
X
-
Stupid yes, but the government have no choice in the matter because they've surrendered their powers to the EU. -
Still not the EU, they're not telling the UK government to put the speed limits down, thats the UK government interpreting the ruling in it's own unique way. In fact they could put in other measures to combat emissions but have decided that this is in their best interests. They could keep it to 70 and stop all these variable speed limits and low the traffic to keep at a constant speed which would keep emissions down as people would not have to keep slowing and accelerating, they could ban all old smokers, they could do many things but EU sceptics suddenly jump on the fact that because the UK government drop the speed limits then obviously the EU told them to (hasn't happened in other EU countries has it?)Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
As AtW says, absolute bollocks“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
No they haven't, you and the rest of populace did by voting for the government giving them a mandate to allow this. As it is, the government can appeal or make alternative proposals...you just don't like the EU and like other EU sceptics automatically blame them for everything that happens that you don't like.Originally posted by KentPhilip View PostStupid yes, but the government have no choice in the matter because they've surrendered their powers to the EU.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
The following Telegraph link:Originally posted by darmstadt View PostStill not the EU, they're not telling the UK government to put the speed limits down, thats the UK government interpreting the ruling in it's own unique way. In fact they could put in other measures to combat emissions but have decided that this is in their best interests. They could keep it to 70 and stop all these variable speed limits and low the traffic to keep at a constant speed which would keep emissions down as people would not have to keep slowing and accelerating, they could ban all old smokers, they could do many things but EU sceptics suddenly jump on the fact that because the UK government drop the speed limits then obviously the EU told them to (hasn't happened in other EU countries has it?)
As AtW says, absolute bollocks
Motorists face 60mph speed limit on motorways - Telegraph
says:
OK I agree there is a slightly broader remit - that the EU is not specifically saying we need to drive at 60mph. But if we don't do that then we will have to do something equally onerous, such as getting rid of old rust-bucket cars, or having permanently slower speed limits.Under EU guidelines, the Government could be fined hundreds of millions of pounds if the levels of nitrogen dioxide emitted by exhausts are breached.
So it is still the case that the EU are forcing the British government to make changes to the way that we drive and use the roads. This is wrong - it should be the British electorate who decide these things in Britain, not the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.Comment
-
FTFYOriginally posted by KentPhilip View PostSo it is still the case that the EU are forcing the British government to make changes to the way that we drive and use the roads. This is wrong - it should be unelected bureaucrats in Westminster who decide these things in Britain, not the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Note the word 'guidelines', doesn't mean law...Originally posted by KentPhilip View PostThe following Telegraph link:
Motorists face 60mph speed limit on motorways - Telegraph
says:
OK I agree there is a slightly broader remit - that the EU is not specifically saying we need to drive at 60mph. But if we don't do that then we will have to do something equally onerous, such as getting rid of old rust-bucket cars, or having permanently slower speed limits.Under EU guidelines, the Government could be fined hundreds of millions of pounds if the levels of nitrogen dioxide emitted by exhausts are breached.
So it is still the case that the EU are forcing the British government to make changes to the way that we drive and use the roads. This is wrong - it should be the British electorate who decide these things in Britain, not the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
WHS +1. You really think an MP came up with that idea and not a faceless civil servant who dropped it into an MP's lap?Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
FTFYSo it is still the case that the EU are forcing the British government to make changes to the way that we drive and use the roads. This is wrong - it should be unelected bureaucrats in Westminster who decide these things in Britain, not the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
You're assuming we wouldn't have exactly the same sort of laws if it wasn't for the EU.Originally posted by KentPhilip View PostSo it is still the case that the EU are forcing the British government to make changes to the way that we drive and use the roads. This is wrong - it should be the British electorate who decide these things in Britain, not the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.
If you don't like the way the EU operates you can express your opinion by voting in the EU elections. Which is exactly the same amount of influence you have over the way the British government operates.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Whether you call it "guidelines" or "law" the effect is still the same - financial coercion by the EU on the British state.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostNote the word 'guidelines', doesn't mean law...Comment
-
Maybe we would, but that is not the point. It would be nice if we had a choice in the matter.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostYou're assuming we wouldn't have exactly the same sort of laws if it wasn't for the EU.
No it isn't the same influence.Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
If you don't like the way the EU operates you can express your opinion by voting in the EU elections. Which is exactly the same amount of influence you have over the way the British government operates.
In the UK, elections are 100% influenced by British voters. In the EU elections the figure is, say, 10%. i.e. we have the votes of a load of foreigners determining the outcome on matters that affect the UK. We don't want that. There has been no referendum where the UK electorate has stated that we wish to merge our political powers with europeans, so UK politicians have had no mandate to set this in place.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment