• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Still able to dodge tax

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    It means 'we're going to continue pissing away too much money like almost every government has done since 1945 1906 and you lot are going to pay for it'.
    FTFY

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by expat View Post
      FTFY
      Yes, I'd agree on that, but then it would include two world wars which I think we could consider 'exceptional circumstances'. As for the rest, I simply don't see the point in giving more money to government when it has proven time and time again to be unable to manage it.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        Yes, I'd agree on that, but then it would include two world wars which I think we could consider 'exceptional circumstances'. As for the rest, I simply don't see the point in giving more money to government when it has proven time and time again to be unable to manage it.
        Lucky that tax isn't based on whether the tax payer can see the point.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by russell View Post
          I would be happier if they increased corporation tax for 1 man Ltd companies by 1% and then repeal IR35. Much cleaner and easier.
          That would be sensible and therefore never happen
          Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

          No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
            Lucky that tax isn't based on whether the tax payer can see the point.
            At the coming local elections in NL, politicians will knock on our door asking for our votes. I shall set them a test. I shall start by telling them all the things I think our ´community´ needs, like an indoor skating rink, an indoor cycling track, a bypass road around the village, a ´community centre´ (got to think of the poor and downtrodden), and other nice things. The first one to say 'no, we can't afford any of those things' will get my vote.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by russell View Post
              Seems like after the Autumn Statement there was no changes that make it more difficult to dodge tax by paying dividends/low salary, hurrah!!!! Chooo Chooo
              I got a UK Contractor email showing that HMRC are looking at if the ratio of low salary to high dividends is worth further investigation, as one of the headlines.

              Can't link to it as I deleted it, but interesting nonetheless.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by evilagent View Post
                I got a UK Contractor email showing that HMRC are looking at if the ratio of low salary to high dividends is worth further investigation, as one of the headlines.

                Can't link to it as I deleted it, but interesting nonetheless.
                Told ya - Practically all it would take them is to whump up some SQL and list the top 10000
                Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by russell View Post
                  I would be happier if they increased corporation tax for 1 man Ltd companies by 1% and then repeal IR35. Much cleaner and easier.
                  And with a better end result for all parties.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by evilagent View Post
                    I got a UK Contractor email showing that HMRC are looking at if the ratio of low salary to high dividends is worth further investigation, as one of the headlines.

                    Can't link to it as I deleted it, but interesting nonetheless.
                    If we're moaning about the way the government wastes money, then we certainly want HMRC to be focusing on those cases where it has the most to gain. And they should start with those that pay exactly the right amount of salary - i.e. however accountants work it out that you pay the minimum tax, because that can only be about tax avoidance.
                    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                      If we're moaning about the way the government wastes money, then we certainly want HMRC to be focusing on those cases where it has the most to gain. And they should start with those that pay exactly the right amount of salary - i.e. however accountants work it out that you pay the minimum tax, because that can only be about tax avoidance.
                      ...which is legal.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X