• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Chico was right. God is matematically proven

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Fungus
    Do we need to state the bleedin' obvious?
    Are you one of those cockney chaps ? All cock and no balls ?

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by AtW
      You should try learn how to argue your view without resorting to name calling, but then again its probably best for you not to because it makes it easier to sport a retard.
      Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?
      I've seen much of the rest of the world. It is brutal and cruel and dark, Rome is the light.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Francko
        Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?
        But I do - "retard" is a medical term, not name calling

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Francko
          Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?
          Here is a good counter example to one of the axioms: basically one of the axioms state that the opposite of a good thing is a bad thing. So if you can find a good thing and it's opposite is also a good thing then the axiom is flawed.

          A good thing: Mountains are high. It's opposite: Valleys are low.

          But you can also say:

          A good thing: Valleys are low. It's opposite: Mountains are high.

          QED

          HTH
          Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
          threadeds website, and here's my blog.

          Comment


            #15
            Good and Bad are relative things, say Chico's favourite humanist Hitler had different view on those things than most people.

            Comment


              #16
              Who says that if god is real he must be benign? Maybe he's a right bastard like most gods apart from the Christian one. Or maybe there are lots of gods like the Romans/Greeks believed. Much more in keeping with the CUK free market philosophy, the single all powerful god sounds like socialism to me.
              bloggoth

              If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
              John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by xoggoth
                Romans/Greeks believed.
                I much prefer those Gods - for starters when you make sacrifice to them you just give them bones and keep the meet, thanks to Prometeus. Plus these Gods are much more like human - Zeus shags eathly women and this allows him to be kept in touch. IMO all Gods that came after these are much more opressive and pocessive.

                Comment


                  #18
                  In the Greek mindset Zeus and co. came after the other gods, such as Gaea etc. Zeus himself was the son of Cronus who was the son of Uranus who was the son of Gaea, and also her husband... Also there is much more of the "scratch my back I'll scratch yours" mentality. i.e. if you give a sacrifice to a god, then you expect something in return and as each god had multiple uses you'd give a sacrifice to the usefulness required. So if you wanted rain you'd sacrifice to the rain from zeus, if you were making a contract you'd scarifice to the keeper of oaths zeus, quite often in different places.
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by AtW
                    But I do - "retard" is a medical term, not name calling
                    Actually I suffer from tourette syndrome, whanker. I have suffered from this affliction all my life, whanker. I find your lack of understanding contemptible, complete whanker.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      "Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurological disorder characterized by tics -- involuntary, rapid, sudden movements or vocalizations that occur repeatedly in the same way. "

                      This (if true) should not be affect your judgement that can be inferred from your posts on this board.

                      While I am sympathetic to anyone suffering from any illness (apart from self-inflicted) it should not be a blank cheque for saying or doing anything: if you can't handle responses on this board then don't post.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X