Originally posted by suityou01
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Another large leak at Fukushima
Collapse
X
-
-
Mate, seriously, to be off by 100 gallons means you didn't even consider it. I'm sure you could include a margin for error to include internal anomalies.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIt isn't a GCSE-level question when it's tilted (less than 90 deg)
It's as fiddly as hell even in an idealised situation with smooth internal sides. But if the tank has internal fittings or shape variations and suchlike its pretty much completely intractable and they'd be better off resorting to physical modelling/experimentation (preferably before they have to try that with radioactive liquid!)
This really isn't rocket science
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Assuming a true cylinder then the volume of the whole would be PI * r * r * h.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostAnd how do you calculate the volume?
HTHKnock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Yes, but the volume of the angled bit you've chopped off?Originally posted by suityou01 View PostAssuming a true cylinder then the volume of the whole would be PI * r * r * h.
HTHComment
-
Surely they can detect the bloody level as it's being filled?Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIt isn't a GCSE-level question when it's tilted (less than 90 deg)
It's as fiddly as hell even in an idealised situation with smooth internal sides. But if the tank has internal fittings or shape variations and suchlike its pretty much completely intractable and they'd be better off resorting to physical modelling/experimentation (preferably before they have to try that with radioactive liquid!)Comment
-
Comment
-
It's not a brewing bucketOriginally posted by jamesbrown View PostSurely they can detect the bloody level as it's being filled?
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Comment
-
It's got a manhole in the top, it isn't a space shuttleOriginally posted by suityou01 View PostIt's not a brewing bucket
Comment
-
How about this for a totally crazy idea.
Take one identical container. Fill to the brim on a level surface with clean water. Tilt to the same angle as the one in situ. Water gets spilled. Straighten up and measure what's left. Then only fill the one in situ with that amount?
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51


Comment