• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Is it just me

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Is it just me

    Or should I be less irritated when expensive enquiries come up with absolutely ludicrous statements like this excerpt from the Forest Gate report

    "The forensic scientist who looked into the incident found no fingerprints on the trigger of the weapon - but also concluded the only way for the weapon to have been fired was for the trigger to have been pulled."


    FFS!!!

    Full article here
    There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

    #2
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Convenient...?
    Very. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

    Comment


      #3
      It doesn't take a forensic scientist to work out..

      Originally posted by sunnysan
      The forensic scientist who looked into the incident found no fingerprints on the trigger of the weapon
      Don't armed police usually wear gloves?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Fungus
        Very. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
        Isn't it just possible that he isn't a 'victim' but is actally a criminal

        Comment


          #5
          Mmmm, could be...

          Originally posted by white-anglo-reactionary
          Don't armed police usually wear gloves?
          That suggests the police officer, who was wearing two pairs of gloves as part of a chemical biological radiological nuclear (CBRN) suit, fired the gun accidentally.

          I could be a forensic scientist, me.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by John Galt
            Isn't it just possible that he isn't a 'victim' but is actally a criminal
            If he's done nothing wrong, he has nothing to fear. Just ask David Kelly.

            Oh.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally Posted by Fungus
              Very. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

              Originally posted by John Galt
              Isn't it just possible that he isn't a 'victim' but is actally a criminal
              No I was thinking about what dinner might be. But now you mention it, I read that they were petty criminals with a string of minor offences such as theft behind them. Not exactly sweet and innocent.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Fungus
                Originally Posted by Fungus
                Very. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?



                No I was thinking about what dinner might be. But now you mention it, I read that they were petty criminals with a string of minor offences such as theft behind them. Not exactly sweet and innocent.
                And the article doesn't mention it, but what became of the £30k or so in cash alledgedly found in the house?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well

                  Could they not have just sent 2 plods round then instead of 250 armed officers?
                  There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by meridian
                    And the article doesn't mention it, but what became of the £30k or so in cash alledgedly found in the house?
                    And the alleged big pile of kiddie porn?
                    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X