• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Fatness drive 2013 - update

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    steroid abuse
    ...and Big Mac abuse
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
      Utter nonsense, I'm afraid. Because of the obesity/weight epidemic most people are not at their optimal BMI - that doesn't mean you can ignore the fact.
      Ostensibly, it's a measure, that can work ok generally. But it doesn't work well for lots of people. I canoe and swim regularly and have a large chest, 48" and a 17" neck. I have, I reckon (I've not been tested for a while), about 17% body fat, which is good, for a man of my age. I'm 15.5 stone. If I lost a stone, I'd look gaunt, but on BMI, I am overweight. I'm not, I am far from overweight; I look good, I am remarkably fit, I have a resting heart rate of 60, Cholesterol of 4.1 and BP 120/80.

      There are much better measures out there. But if you were to take someone's height, then their weight, and perform analysis on that, you'd be wrong more than you think. A good friend looks skinny, but is a committed cyclist, and he would appear overweight on the BMI scale, despite being as fit as anyone I know.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
        Ostensibly, it's a measure, that can work ok generally. But it doesn't work well for lots of people. I canoe and swim regularly and have a large chest, 48" and a 17" neck. I have, I reckon (I've not been tested for a while), about 17% body fat, which is good, for a man of my age. I'm 15.5 stone. If I lost a stone, I'd look gaunt, but on BMI, I am overweight. I'm not, I am far from overweight; I look good, I am remarkably fit, I have a resting heart rate of 60, Cholesterol of 4.1 and BP 120/80.

        There are much better measures out there. But if you were to take someone's height, then their weight, and perform analysis on that, you'd be wrong more than you think. A good friend looks skinny, but is a committed cyclist, and he would appear overweight on the BMI scale, despite being as fit as anyone I know.
        Fat bastard!
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Fat bastard!
          Far from it. 6'1" and probably in the best shape in my life since teenage.

          Admittedly, the 15 5 was the weight after our holiday, I'd normally be just under 15 and extremely happy about it.
          Last edited by Old Hack; 18 September 2013, 13:24. Reason: Got the weights wrong.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
            Far from it. 6'1" and probably in the best shape in my life since teenage.

            Admittedly, the 15 5 was the weight after our holiday, I'd normally be just under 14 and extremely happy about it.
            Just kidding; looks more than OK. I'm 6'1" and just under 15 stone now, but with fat at 13%, resting HR 48, lactate threshold HR 171 with max HR 181 and cholesterol and BP about the same as yours. I never stopped with sport though since I was a kid.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Just kidding; looks more than OK. I'm 6'1" and just under 15 stone now, but with fat at 13%, resting HR 48, lactate threshold HR 171 with max HR 181 and cholesterol and BP about the same as yours. I never stopped with sport though since I was a kid.
              Oh, I knew that; you being ex rugby and into your bikes I thought you'd be 15 ~abouts. 48 bloody good, some F1 jockeys are higher. Very impressed.

              Nor me, only a very bad knee injury stopped the Rugby, and after that, I just used other sports to stay fit. Now, aged perilously close to 50, I exercise a lot with the kids and on my own: cycling, canoeing, walking, swimming and surfing, of sorts. I have a huge kite now, states 80kg min to fly it and it's a bloody handful. An hour flying it and the whole top half and core is on fire. Literally the most fun I have had exercising out of sport.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Just kidding; looks more than OK. I'm 6'1" and just under 15 stone now, but with fat at 13%, resting HR 48, lactate threshold HR 171 with max HR 181 and cholesterol and BP about the same as yours. I never stopped with sport though since I was a kid.
                How's your drinking? Tested your liver function yet?
                Did mine at the start of the year and was surprised to find it was spot on, given the fun I had in my youth.
                But the doc told me that increasingly he saw middle class people who were on half a bottle of wine a day who had incipient liver problems. Given that I used to do that, I resolved to not spoil a good thing and lay off the booze.
                Hard Brexit now!
                #prayfornodeal

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                  As I've said in the other thread: a good recipe for a healthy life is moderation in all things: and that includes exercise. There is such a thing as too much.

                  As much as I like running (as a hobby) and exercising the people that do it day in/out don't look that healthy, their faces look quite gaunt.

                  qh
                  He had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.

                  I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    How's your drinking? Tested your liver function yet?
                    Did mine at the start of the year and was surprised to find it was spot on, given the fun I had in my youth.
                    But the doc told me that increasingly he saw middle class people who were on half a bottle of wine a day who had incipient liver problems. Given that I used to do that, I resolved to not spoil a good thing and lay off the booze.
                    I had this done as part of my Private Insurance MOT. I found out years ago that I had an hereditary syndrome. It appears having it has no ill effects, but it keeps your liver functioning well, and keeps the cholesterol down too. Wasted on me, normally a light drinker.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
                      Oh, I knew that; you being ex rugby and into your bikes I thought you'd be 15 ~abouts. 48 bloody good, some F1 jockeys are higher. Very impressed.

                      Nor me, only a very bad knee injury stopped the Rugby, and after that, I just used other sports to stay fit. Now, aged perilously close to 50, I exercise a lot with the kids and on my own: cycling, canoeing, walking, swimming and surfing, of sorts. I have a huge kite now, states 80kg min to fly it and it's a bloody handful. An hour flying it and the whole top half and core is on fire. Literally the most fun I have had exercising out of sport.
                      I was 16 stone when I played rugby; that was too much to carry into middle age and beyond. I think the one advantage I got from all the high intensity interval training for 7s is the very high lactate threshold, which helps with cycling seeing as I don't have unusually big or good lungs; in fact, I've had some minor problems with coughs and slime all my life and often have to cough up some gooey blobs of slime after a really intense training session.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X