Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Royal Mail float
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Ultimately, it was rather a disappointment but, with the info. to hand a few days ago, it was unquestionably a smart move to get involved. -
I like to have my money actually earned.Originally posted by GazCol View PostIt's £300 for 10 minutes (and I'm being generous) work.
When you sell your shares then let me know what the real sell price is (less costs).Comment
-
No, it wasn't.Originally posted by jamesbrown View Postwith the info. to hand a few days ago, it was unquestionably a smart move to get involved.Comment
-
Oh, so now rather than being a bad move financially, you don't agree with the morals of it. Lovely.Originally posted by AtW View PostI like to have my money actually earned.
When you sell your shares then let me know what the real sell price is (less costs).Comment
-
Have you sold them yet?Originally posted by GazCol View PostOh, so now rather than being a bad move financially, you don't agree with the morals of it. Lovely.
It's not profit until you get the money.
I certainly don't agree how this thing was handled - if there was indeed such high demand then IPO price should have been set at higher level to make sure the seller (taxpayers) gets the most money for the asset.Comment
-
He can't help himself, he always has to have the last say...Originally posted by GazCol View PostOh, so now rather than being a bad move financially, you don't agree with the morals of it. Lovely.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
That's not true...Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostHe can't help himself, he always has to have the last say...
Comment
-
Evidence to the contrary. It was undervalued at IPO and that's precisely why it was a good buy. There was always going to be some margin, as they want sufficient interest in the shares. However, the Gov't misjudged the level of interest and wrongly decided not to re-price beyond the 260-330p range after the level of interest became clear. You need to re-read this thread, as the logic for the strong opening was clearly identified at the beginning.Originally posted by AtW View PostNo, it wasn't.
I sold at ~450p, as I believe it's fully valued at that level and not worth retaining for 227 shares. Yes, it's only 250 quid profit after costs (a disappointment), but it was a good call nevertheless. Incidentally, had I received the full allocation requested, I would've held onto them for the medium-term (at least until they entered the FTSE and possibly until the first dividend).Comment
-
+1Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostEvidence to the contrary. It was undervalued at IPO and that's precisely why it was a good buy. There was always going to be some margin, as they want sufficient interest in the shares. However, the Gov't misjudged the level of interest and wrongly decided not to re-price beyond the 260-330p range after the level of interest became clear. You need to re-read this thread, as the logic for the strong opening was clearly identified at the beginning.
Profits from taking carefully measured financial risks are earnings.Comment
-
Not a lot, I've spent double the amount on new front tyres for my car last month.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostYes, it's only 250 quid profit after costs (a disappointment)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Today 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Yesterday 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment