Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Royal Mail float
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GazCol View PostIt's £300 for 10 minutes (and I'm being generous) work.
When you sell your shares then let me know what the real sell price is (less costs).Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View Postwith the info. to hand a few days ago, it was unquestionably a smart move to get involved.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI like to have my money actually earned.
When you sell your shares then let me know what the real sell price is (less costs).Comment
-
Originally posted by GazCol View PostOh, so now rather than being a bad move financially, you don't agree with the morals of it. Lovely.
It's not profit until you get the money.
I certainly don't agree how this thing was handled - if there was indeed such high demand then IPO price should have been set at higher level to make sure the seller (taxpayers) gets the most money for the asset.Comment
-
Originally posted by GazCol View PostOh, so now rather than being a bad move financially, you don't agree with the morals of it. Lovely.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostHe can't help himself, he always has to have the last say...
Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostNo, it wasn't.
I sold at ~450p, as I believe it's fully valued at that level and not worth retaining for 227 shares. Yes, it's only 250 quid profit after costs (a disappointment), but it was a good call nevertheless. Incidentally, had I received the full allocation requested, I would've held onto them for the medium-term (at least until they entered the FTSE and possibly until the first dividend).Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostEvidence to the contrary. It was undervalued at IPO and that's precisely why it was a good buy. There was always going to be some margin, as they want sufficient interest in the shares. However, the Gov't misjudged the level of interest and wrongly decided not to re-price beyond the 260-330p range after the level of interest became clear. You need to re-read this thread, as the logic for the strong opening was clearly identified at the beginning.
Profits from taking carefully measured financial risks are earnings.Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostYes, it's only 250 quid profit after costs (a disappointment)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment