Originally posted by bobsmithldn
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Now this pisses me off
Collapse
X
-
-
I agree. She deserved compensation for harassment/bullying.Originally posted by sasguruCan't believe I'm agreeing with AndyWanker, but do you know all the facts? How do you know it's a "stupid" claim from an "oversensitive" woman?
If there was bullying, she deserves compensation - I'm not sure what her salary was, but £800k for a highly paid City worker is not much - that might be less than her yearly bonus.Comment
-
Comment
-
OMG I can'tbelieve I'm going to agree with SASOriginally posted by sasguruCan't believe I'm agreeing with AndyWanker, but do you know all the facts? How do you know it's a "stupid" claim from an "oversensitive" woman?
If there was bullying, she deserves compensation - I'm not sure what her salary was, but £800k for a highly paid City worker is not much - that might be less than her yearly bonus.
what is teh world coming to?!?!!"Well behaved women rarely make history"
Comment
-
If the allegations are true as the Court found, then I think the Bank should pay as they neglected to do anything about it. If the allegations are not true then the Bank should still pay because the have been so stupid and negligent in employing her in the first place. How many times have you seen company’s employ persons who your gut instinct tells you this person is not right and there will be trouble and it turns out to be true?HEALTH WARNING. IT Can Damage your Health. Free Advice. Advice in the forum is the £9,995 version. By reading the health warning you are agreeing to the terms and conditions. Advice maybe bad as well as good. 24 months interest free. Your home is at risk if you don’t keep up payments. Advice limited to availability.Comment
-
i thought there was a limit to how much could be claimed of 56K, unless it was sex/racial discrimination, is this setting a new precedence or have i just missed something regarding her claim, also is the money she gets tax free?Comment
-
Right well I don't know about you lot but I'm off to have a few pints around Tower Hamlets and look for the senistive bird with black hair drinking champagne, then give a bit of the old yorkshire charm and get her to put me up for the rest of my contract in return for sexual favours (before you ask yes I have seen her picture and I've done a lot worse.)
Then whilst having my feet under the table, fleece the bitch for as much as I can before I p*ss off leaving her destitute.
Ok so I'm dreaming however if that's bullying **** knows whats going on, why she just didn't invite the 4 birds for a drink then batter them with a bar stool I don't know, we are going too soft in this country.Comment
-
Seems a bit OTT but then again if she was paid £100k per year as I've read elsewhere, and that's her basic then maybe it wasn't quite as much as it appears.
Bizarre thing about it is it was a bunch of other women who were the 'oppresors'.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
That's what I thought.
Bird works in a department as a general secretary.
Staff tease her, call her names and ignore her.
She goes to a tribuneral and gets awarded £800K for the terrible pchychological damage.
Pathetic.Comment
-
Well she had a nervous breakdown, goes back to work and this happens to her. The people who carried out these acts on her should have known better, rather than behaving like 12 year old school girls. As for the awards this sums it up (I normally think these things are blown way out of proportion, but in this case maybe not):Originally posted by DimPrawnThat's what I thought.
Bird works in a department as a general secretary.
Staff tease her, call her names and ignore her.
She goes to a tribuneral and gets awarded £800K for the terrible pchychological damage.
Pathetic.
Naomi Branston, an employment specialist at Taylor Wessing, said that the £640,000 award for loss of future earnings was not actually that large, since Ms Green was only 36 and was earning £100,000 a year.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58


Comment