Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Kelly comes back from the Dead points an accusing finger (without fingerprints)
Bliar was happy to go to war with Bush and that would have happened regardless if Dr Kelly was alive or dead.
But if as was revealed Kelly knew they were lying about WMD it would have made it more interesting, I suspect the deed was done without authorisation at least at country manager level.
I find it all very suspicious but still I think he killed himself; Dr Kelly was a scientist who had to deal with politicians on a daily basis. It's bad enough for techies dealing with managers, he had it even worse and that could well deplete his will to live very quickly.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
I find it hard to believe that such a sensitive man would choose a violent end. Pills, yes, maybe a rope or the gas oven ,but not sawing your hands off with a blunt knife
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work
But if as was revealed Kelly knew they were lying about WMD it would have made it more interesting, I suspect the deed was done without authorisation at least at country manager level.
Bet they got the yanks to do it, so they can say they didn't kill him without lying about it
I find it hard to believe that such a sensitive man would choose a violent end. Pills, yes, maybe a rope or the gas oven ,but not sawing your hands off with a blunt knife
The blunt knife bit is indeed suspicious.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
But if as was revealed Kelly knew they were lying about WMD it would have made it more interesting, I suspect the deed was done without authorisation at least at country manager level.
Politicians are lying most of the time, you don't need a PhD to tell you that.
Hassled to death by Mr B Liar's bastard accomplices it seems.
"I don’t know what was going through David’s head at the time, but when I saw him giving evidence to the parliamentary foreign affairs select committee he was extremely distressed and not in control, which was unusual for him. I’m sure it must have been traumatic.” Referring to Dr Kelly’s belief that there was no evidence of WMD in Iraq, Prof Hay added: “He was in a position to rubbish the Government’s line and they need to quell that. David had great integrity — he was interested in the truth.
“I feel that he was hounded. He was playing a very dangerous game because of the position he was in.”
Comment