• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Computer error

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    I think it's difficult to talk about legislating for software quality without requiring software vendors to provide warranties for shrink-wrapped products. Open source would be a massive can of worms as well.

    I think problems like the one with the RM system are best handled by making company officers liable for criminal prosecution. There are clearly problems beyond bad software that need to be addressed when something like this happens.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by vetran View Post
      in most systems proving the system works more or less as specified would be a massive improvement.

      Culpability and a minimum level of basic testing would be what I would aspire to for legislation.
      You'd need to start by demonstrating that what's specified is what's right, and that opens a whole new can of worms.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment

      Working...
      X