• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

A question for the girls

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    I see her point.
    Very popular with Cloggie men and a IMO bit sad really for anyone over the age of 7.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #32
      Isn't that how you normally tell who the cloggy chavs are, along with the shiny jackets and bromfiets?
      "Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles

      Norrahe's blog

      Comment


        #33
        I have no problem with shoes but no socks
        I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

        Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
        CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
        CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
          That's ok, trainers with no socks are a complete no no.
          You don't want to see me training.

          And you certainly don't want to smell my training shoes. In fact, you're probably better not being anywhere close and downwind of them. About 50km distance would be safe.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by norrahe View Post
            Isn't that how you normally tell who the cloggy chavs are, along with the shiny jackets and bromfiets?
            Not just the chavs, lots of cloggy men wear those shirts, especially middle class men, but I think it's probably a provincial thing.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by norrahe View Post
              Brightly coloured jeans.

              Loafers with no socks.

              Tweed jackets paired with jeans.
              But they're ok all together, aren't they?
              But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

              Comment


                #37
                Skinny jeans look stupid.

                Young people generally are not very well dressed these days.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  Skinny jeans look stupid.

                  Young people generally are not very well dressed these days.
                  Yeah they seem to insist on having the crotch of trousers around their knees, they're just one gust of air away from a debagging.
                  I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

                  Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
                  CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
                  CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
                    But they're ok all together, aren't they?
                    You're Dutch aren't you?
                    "Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles

                    Norrahe's blog

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by norrahe View Post
                      You're Dutch aren't you?
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X