• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Suity cries like a girl as Spurs finish 5th

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Of course you can. The deciding factor is really whether the player wants to go or the club wants rid of them. Ronaldo to Madrid was inevitable because the player wanted to go. If Ronaldo had actually wanted to stay at Man U they'd have kept him. As it was they had no choice but to hold out for the best price.

    I don't think Suarez leaving is likely after this season, that might change if next year is a disaster. I don't think City would part with Yaya Toure either.

    I think he would have had no choice with £80 odd million on the table.

    Seriously for a club without stupid money backers (Chelsea/Man City) you cannot turn down that amount of money - it is business suicide

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      Oh give it up and stop making excuses. Just to be starting with, you can't extrapolate points per game.
      OK, in a results-oriented activity, how else would you guage the absolute effect of a manager on a team?

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by original PM View Post
        I think he would have had no choice with £80 odd million on the table.

        Seriously for a club without stupid money backers (Chelsea/Man City) you cannot turn down that amount of money - it is business suicide
        Man U are one of the richest clubs in the world by revenue and well aware that you don't win the CL by selling your superstar players. They would have kept him if he hadn't wanted to go, I've no doubt about that, because there was no way they could replace him at any cost and they lost CL revenue for years by doing less well. They made the final two years running and won it once with him, and 2011 aside have struggled to get past the last eight since, so it's probably cost them half of that £80 million over the last 5 years to be without him.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          Man U are one of the richest clubs in the world by revenue and well aware that you don't win the CL by selling your superstar players. They would have kept him if he hadn't wanted to go, I've no doubt about that, because there was no way they could replace him at any cost and they lost CL revenue for years by doing less well. They made the final two years running and won it once with him, and 2011 aside have struggled to get past the last eight since, so it's probably cost them half of that £80 million over the last 5 years to be without him.
          yeah possibly...

          but you seem to be a Liverpool fan hoping your best playing does not get sold!

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by original PM View Post
            I think he would have had no choice with £80 odd million on the table.

            Seriously for a club without stupid money backers (Chelsea/Man City) you cannot turn down that amount of money - it is business suicide
            You are having a laugh right? Ronaldo is now the biggest football superstar on earth (ahead of Messi now as well). Shirt sales, sponsorships, advertisement deals, CL football would all more than cover that £80 Million. They were just making the best of a bad situation by selling him for that amount.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by original PM View Post
              but you seem to be a Liverpool fan hoping your best playing does not get sold!
              Because Liverpool are also a big club by revenue, albeit not currently in the top 10 that's largely to do with not having CL football for several years. They don't need the money, even at £70 million it's only a £40 million profit and they will make more than that with two or three years of continuous CL football and the boost to shirt sales etc that brings. He'll only be sold if he wants to go, and I think that situation got sorted out last year.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by doodab View Post
                Because Liverpool are also a big club by revenue, albeit not currently in the top 10 that's largely to do with not having CL football for several years. They don't need the money, even at £70 million it's only a £40 million profit and they will make more than that with two or three years of continuous CL football and the boost to shirt sales etc that brings. He'll only be sold if he wants to go, and I think that situation got sorted out last year.
                Suarez will be gone in the summer. Mark my words

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                  Suarez will be gone in the summer. Mark my words
                  I agree!!!

                  Mainly because I do not think he has any loyalty except to himself and his pocket.

                  A bit like any of us really - if we get the chance to legally move contract for a better rate who would not?

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by doodab View Post
                    Of course you can. The deciding factor is really whether the player wants to go or the club wants rid of them. Ronaldo to Madrid was inevitable because the player wanted to go. If Ronaldo had actually wanted to stay at Man U they'd have kept him. As it was they had no choice but to hold out for the best price.

                    I don't think Suarez leaving is likely after this season, that might change if next year is a disaster. I don't think City would part with Yaya Toure either.
                    Ronaldo was always pretty clear that his boyhood team was RM and that one day he would love to play for them. Once they came knocking then it was obvious what would happen. As a United supporter I have no problem with that. The same cannot be said for Rooney when he wanted to move to City or Chelsea or Beckham moving to RM. If I were in the same position as Ronaldo, if I were playing for any club and United came in for me, then I'd probably make the same decision. Obviously it helps when your boy hood club is one of the greats rather than say Crewe.
                    Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                    I preferred version 1!

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                      Suarez will be gone in the summer. Mark my words
                      I agree. He wants to win trophies.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X