• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Amazon Corporation Tax

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    You used the word profitable in a different sentence so it doesn't count



    Seriously. Don't go equating corp tax with sales then blame everyone else for "misunderstanding" you
    Firstly I didn't equate the two ever, but you believe there is no relationship at all between corp tax and sales, you can have sales of £10 and get a corp tax bill of £20000000.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
      So they are exploiting a loophole then.

      If the UK government wants to, it can easily crack down on this sort of thing.

      Easy thing to sort out, if you have UK sales of a billion quid and you pay a nominal amount in corp tax, examine the records and impose a heavy fine on them which is equivalent to the tax they avoided plus a big interest.
      Its not a loophole and its not easy to stamp out. The company making the profit is not the UK one and so there is no tax to pay on the UK profits, because there are no Uk profits.

      The only way to stop it is for all nations to have braodly similar corp tax rates, but that will never happen.
      Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

      I preferred version 1!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by proggy View Post
        Firstly I didn't equate the two ever, but you believe there is no relationship at all between corp tax and sales, you can have sales of £10 and get a corp tax bill of £20000000.
        You can make profit on other things than sales now proggy, so I'd reign in the laughter.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by vetran View Post
          Oh I feel dirty I'm just about to agree with 'the Great Cretin' (may the statistics be with him).

          We need to rein in Amazon to allow competition to compete. As most of the profit comes via avoiding VAT and working offshore lets tax them until onshore business can compete.
          Amazon would be dominant regardles

          Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
          So they are exploiting a loophole then.

          If the UK government wants to, it can easily crack down on this sort of thing.

          Easy thing to sort out, if you have UK sales of a billion quid and you pay a nominal amount in corp tax, examine the records and impose a heavy fine on them which is equivalent to the tax they avoided plus a big interest.
          And how pray tell do we work out "the tax they avoided", and make it legal to fine someone for avoiding tax rather than evading it? It's perfectly possible for a company to have £1bn sales and make a loss, it happens to massive companies every year like Nokia, as one example.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by proggy View Post
            you can have sales of £10 and get a corp tax bill of £20000000.
            Errrrr.... example?
            Contracting: more of the money, less of the sh1t

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by BoredBloke View Post
              Its not a loophole and its not easy to stamp out. The company making the profit is not the UK one and so there is no tax to pay on the UK profits, because there are no Uk profits.

              The only way to stop it is for all nations to have broadly similar corp tax rates, but that will never happen.
              WHS. The problem is local corporation tax is not compatible with international corporations. And nobody can deny Amazon is an international business; it's not like they're a UK operation routing funds through the Isle of Man to avoid tax. They don't need any UK presence at all, they could ship everything from Luxembourg - would you then make them pay UK corporation tax?
              Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

              Comment


                #27
                Could someone explain what exactly Amazon are doing which is wrong?
                It is an international business just maximising it's profits within the law, isn't it?
                "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                  Could someone explain what exactly Amazon are doing which is wrong?
                  It is an international business just maximising it's profits within the law, isn't it?

                  If you look at it, simply like that, then yes. But then again, BS66 was legal too, and people using it were acting within the law.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by BoredBloke View Post
                    Its not a loophole and its not easy to stamp out. The company making the profit is not the UK one and so there is no tax to pay on the UK profits, because there are no Uk profits.

                    The only way to stop it is for all nations to have braodly similar corp tax rates, but that will never happen.
                    Dont be silly.

                    Any sale that happened in UK is UK sales and you can identify what the profit margin was on that sale.

                    The only factor to consider is whether the government is really interested in cracking down on this. I am guessing no.
                    Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                      It's perfectly possible for a company to have £1bn sales and make a loss, it happens to massive companies every year like Nokia, as one example.
                      Amazon for another example:

                      Amazon Q3 2012 earnings: $13.18 billion revenue, net loss of $274 million
                      Amazon Q3 2012 earnings: $13.18 billion revenue, net loss of $274 million
                      Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X