Lots of modern companies don't need to be 'based' near their customers .To do brokerage you don't need customers in the UK or even an office in the UK; you need a phone, a laptop that connects to the internet and some good contacts. You could do the work anywhere, and some do; why would you base the company in the UK if you can pay less tax elsewhere? The countries that do well in the future will probably be the ones that can attract businesses with low rates of tax AND motivated people; the UK isn't one of them at the moment, in fact I don't think anywhere in western Europe is.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Taxes - what taxes
Collapse
X
-
-
I am not sure how IR35 stifles economic activityOriginally posted by DimPrawn View PostIR35 style punitive tax.
Let HMR&C have a "deemed" UK profit (random large number) and send these companies a tax bill, retrospective, guilty until proved innocent. Let's see how they like it up 'em.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
It's just another lump of legislation that takes up time, along with a whole load more regulation and legislation that we don't need, and it costs money to employ the tax inspectors that work on it. I'd suggest the fear of it prevents some people investing earnings into growing their businesses too.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI am not sure how IR35 stifles economic activityAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
What's the economic sense of using low tax offshore locations for anything other than reducing tax or hiding your assets in high secrecy zones?Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Postsimply "stopping something" that will have considerable unintended consequences (or have you not thought of those?
What "considerable unintended consequences" would be if big companies were stopped using offshores to hide from tax?
US corp tax is 35%, and in UK it is almost 20% now - still too high but a LOT better than US.Comment
-
Why compare to the US? The US is going down the same pan as the UK and the rest of Europe; overloaded with regulation, debt and a dependency culture. The competition will come from the BRICS and Africa in future.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat's the economic sense of using low tax offshore locations for anything other than reducing tax or hiding your assets in high secrecy zones?
What "considerable unintended consequences" would be if big companies were stopped using offshores to hide from tax?
US corp tax is 35%, and in UK it is almost 20% now - still too high but a LOT better than US.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
If those companies only cared about low tax they'd base fully in offshore and never set foot in high tax jurisdictions.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Postwhy would you base the company in the UK if you can pay less tax elsewhere?
The reason they are here is because execs want to live in top city in the world, there is established pro-business court system, Govt is pretty safe even if socialists get elected, etc.Comment
-
I compare to US because a lot of big companies that dodge corp tax are technically US based - they keep their profits in foreign subsidiaries so they don't even end up paying US corp tax which is 35%.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWhy compare to the US?
But they can't lie to stock market in US as otherwise execs would go to jail, so they often say there stuff like effective corp tax rate is 2% on overseas profits
Comment
-
Erm, were you locked in the server room when the last Labour government damned nearly left Britain at the mercy of the IMF? And the one before that in the late 70s?Originally posted by AtW View PostGovt is pretty safe even if socialists get elected, etc.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Companies will headquarter their businesses and incur their largest overheads in countries where they pay the lowest tax and impose the lowest restrictions on their activities. It is virtually impossible for National governments to control this behaviour.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat's the economic sense of using low tax offshore locations for anything other than reducing tax or hiding your assets in high secrecy zones?
What "considerable unintended consequences" would be if big companies were stopped using offshores to hide from tax?
US corp tax is 35%, and in UK it is almost 20% now - still too high but a LOT better than US.
Governments have no entitlement to anything unless it is properly enshrined in law. If you can come up with a proper and enforceable solution that separates the "grey areas" into black and white without causing collateral damage to legitimate business activities then I am sure there would be an OBE in it for you.
By the way do International tax authorities look at where the servers are located that drive your business when assessing your tax obligations?Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
That's ancient history now.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostErm, were you locked in the server room when the last Labour government damned nearly left Britain at the mercy of the IMF? And the one before that in the late 70s?
Same kind of timeframe as Wars of the Roses.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02

Comment