Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cash for honours - the 1st arrest
Collapse
X
-
-
Oh I can tell you that now
Originally posted by wendigo100It depends what's in it for me.
More tax, less public services, more crime, more people in the country.
Next (as our little gender-confused Sas might say)Why not?Comment
-
Apparently 'Lord Sainsbury' has been questioned now as well...
How long before Tony gets a visit I wonder...??
"
Since 1997, everyone who has donated more than 1 million pounds to Labour has been made either a knight or a member of the Lords, according to the Power Inquiry, a probe into changes in U.K. democracy funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, a Quaker charity campaigning for social justice. The report was published in February.
"Last edited by mcquiggd; 13 July 2006, 23:35.Vieze Oude ManComment
-
Originally posted by Dundeegeorgehome of the champagne socialists, the chattering classes, those who know what's best for everybody else.
Those whom others call left-wing control-freak verminous b*stards.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
Originally posted by mcquiggd"Since 1997, everyone who has donated more than 1 million pounds to Labour has been made either a knight or a member of the Lords, according to the Power Inquiry, a probe into changes in U.K. democracy funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, a Quaker charity campaigning for social justice. The report was published in February.
"
How ****ed off are those that donated £900,000 feeling?Comment
-
Snaw
Originally posted by snawRiiight, those guys - anyone to the left of Attila the Hun basically... Well na, I don't live there but I'm sure it'd be a hell of a lot more fun than whichever gated fortress you call home.
My life is fine thank you very much.
I do pretty well, thank you very much.
I am aware of how fortunate I am.
I also work hard.
I also disbelieve anything said by any politician. ANY politician.
Your left-wing darlings are destroying the future of the people who they pretend to be helping. Not me, and not my future. The people they are pretending to be helping. You're a collaborator because you should know better, if you claim to have any intelligence. Admittedly I'm presuming there.Why not?Comment
-
Originally posted by Originally Posted by wendigo100It depends what's in it for me.Originally posted by DundeegeorgeMore tax, less public services, more crime, more people in the country.
Cast your mind back to 1979, when the UK was in a similarly bad state. What happened? It took near-bankrupcy of the country, high unemployment and the winter of discontent to wake people up and admit that we might have a problem. Only then did we change the government, and it took many years to get the UK back on track.
So the options for the opposition are:
1. Let things run as they are for the next 10 years, shouting from the sidelines while the UK slides well and truly into the sh1t again
2. Say what voters want to hear and get elected earlierComment
-
Wendigo
Originally posted by wendigo100A fair point, they are the trends.
Cast your mind back to 1979, when the UK was in a similarly bad state. What happened? It took near-bankrupcy of the country, high unemployment and the winter of discontent to wake people up and admit that we might have a problem. Only then did we change the government, and it took many years to get the UK back on track.
So the options for the opposition are:
1. Let things run as they are for the next 10 years, shouting from the sidelines while the UK slides well and truly into the sh1t again
2. Say what voters want to hear and get elected earlier
It is my opinion (and if it's only mine that still doesn't make it wrong) that David (so what is a principle again?) Cameron doesn't have the intelligence, the drive or the cohones of Mrs. T. You may think that he's spouting this crap to get elected and he will then suddenly somehow transform into the kind of leader required, but I don't. Nothing he has said (NOTHING) presuades me that he will do that. I would be pleased to be proved wrong, but I'm not holding my breath.Why not?Comment
-
Originally posted by wendigo100A fair point, they are the trends.
Cast your mind back to 1979, when the UK was in a similarly bad state. What happened? It took near-bankrupcy of the country, high unemployment and the winter of discontent to wake people up and admit that we might have a problem. Only then did we change the government, and it took many years to get the UK back on track.The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
I fear you could be right DG but hope you're not.
And if you are, then to my mind this demonstrates that David Cameron is basically the product of the British electorate.
The Tories understandably feel as a party, they could not afford another mauling in a General Election.
Many of us are sympathetic to the view that as a country we're over taxed, over regulated, over observed, over tolererant of criminals, and too many immigrants over here.
The Tories gave the electorate the choice to do something about these things in 2001 and 2005. The country chose not to for a 2nd time in 2005.
Result : David Cameron.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment