Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
US extradition yada yada, ratification yada yada!! The important thing is that we won't be paying to keep the little tealeafs in comfort and luxury in our prisons
The US seem to have more power over legitimate UK citizens, than the UK government has over foreigners who have no right to be here.
Maybe the NatWest guys should do a runner to the Hague and claim political asylum from an oppresive government (ours) - after all, they haven't faced any charges in the UK yet are being detained without evidence.
Maybe the NatWest guys should do a runner to the Hague and claim political asylum from an oppresive government (ours) - after all, they haven't faced any charges in the UK yet are being detained without evidence.
That is in fact incorrect, these guys are being detained and evidence of their "wrong doing" was presented to their lawyers before they got the old orange boiler suites issued to them
Then again, these guys could have saved themselves a lot of hassle by just going to America in the first place. Then they would have been given bail instead of having no chance of getting bail now because they will be considered a risk for doing a runner.
Who ever advised them legally did a p1ss poor job.
What's next? UK citizen commits traffic violation whilst on holiday in the US and finds themselves sent back to the US under the same treaty?
I love a good analogy, but a more appropriate one would be "UK citizen commits traffic violation whilst on holiday in the UK and finds themselves sent to the US to stand trial because their hire car was owned by a leasing company that was financed by Enron."
Gotta agree, how can it be fair that three UK bankers face trial in the US for a crime commited in Britain against a British bank?
Add to that the fact that the bank in question doesn't want to bring charges (Probably because they knew most of the facts before - not an unusual circumstance for a bank to have to sell an asset for compliance reasons). How fair a trial are three 'foreign' financial workers going to get in Enron's home state? And why are we using terrorism laws to extradite people accused of commiting financial crime.
The whole thing stinks big time, and once again we're taking it up the arse from the seppos, wioth no wraparound forthcoming.
Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul
I love a good analogy, but a more appropriate one would be "UK citizen commits traffic violation whilst on holiday in the UK and finds themselves sent to the US to stand trial because their hire car was owned by a leasing company that was financed by Enron."
Comment