• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What to do with Qatada?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Anybody who has run away from torture to get safe heaven in this country should be on their fooking best behavior at all times and aim to become a productive tax paying resident of this country..
    How do you judge "best behaviour"? He didn't commit any crimes as far as I'm aware, which is the only definition of "best behaviour" you can use. As for being a tax payer, as someone who wasn't meant to be here was he allowed to work? I assume not. And he's spent half of his time in Britain in a prison cell anyway.

    Qatada was a scumbag parasite who spit at the welcome this country gave him
    He should have been allowed to stay if he'd remembered to say yes sir, thankyou sir, and publicly supported the conservative party? I hope that's not the way the system works.
    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      How do you judge "best behaviour"?
      Well, not preaching hate which is used by terrorists would be a good start.

      That preaching could not be used in indictment, but taxpayers should not be funding such behavior for people who have no inherent right to stay in this country.

      He had right to free speech, but he did not have right to stay in this country.

      Ever heard term "not conducive to the public good"? It's one of the reasons which can cause visa being denied, people who don't like this system can fook off and seek asylum in some other country that is more suitable for their needs, does not have to be UK.
      Last edited by AtW; 8 July 2013, 17:07.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        people who don't like this system can fook off and seek asylum in some other country that is more suitable for their needs, does not have to be UK.
        Which one would you suggest? Or should they have just left him to fend for himself at Heathrow?
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
          Which one would you suggest? Or should they have just left him to fend for himself at Heathrow?
          We need somewhere we can leave his sort to rot till they die, without the oxygen of publicity
          Doing the needful since 1827

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
            Which one would you suggest?
            First safe country on his way from his home country.

            Such as Turkey which is just 555 miles away from Jordan and borders there can be bribed.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
              We need somewhere we can leave his sort to rot till they die, without the oxygen of publicity
              We could have done that in a British prison. As long as you're not worried about that pesky Habeas Corpus thing.

              Originally posted by ATW
              First safe country on his way from his home country.

              Such as Turkey which is just 555 miles away from Jordan and borders there can be bribed.
              British agents kidnap problem people and dump them in Turkey and run away? That'll be great for international relations. Great plan. Well thought out and everything.
              Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                British agents kidnap problem people and dump them in Turkey and run away? That'll be great for international relations. Great plan. Well thought out and everything.
                Why did not he go to Turkey instead? UK is much further away.

                And making a deal with Turkey to keep safely asylum seekers like this would have worked our much cheaper for the taxpayers here of which Qatada certainly wasn't and thankfully never will be.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Why did not he go to Turkey instead? UK is much further away.

                  And making a deal with Turkey to keep safely asylum seekers like this would have worked our much cheaper for the taxpayers here of which Qatada certainly wasn't and thankfully never will be.
                  Why would an Islamic country that claims to be secular in it's government want a political Islamic trouble maker?

                  They wouldn't as it may fuel radicalism in their own population.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                    Why would an Islamic country that claims to be secular in it's government want a political Islamic trouble maker? They wouldn't as it may fuel radicalism in their own population.
                    Why would this country that claims to be secular in it's government want a political Islamic trouble maker?

                    He'd be safe in Turkey, though in fairness if he pissed off Govt there then he would not be getting a few million quid of taxpayer support to fund his lawyers, so he'd have to keep his mouth shut there.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      I actually suspect it is a planned attack on the british way of life, they come here are funded by the tax payer and raise dissension tying up police resources while ones below the radar take part in violence.

                      They laugh all the way to the bank.

                      Important to note they have nothing to do with mainstream Muslims just as 'anders breivik' has nothing to do with mainstream Christianity. They are a bunch of nutters.
                      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X