• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Panorama Mission Accomplished? Secrets of Helmand

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I used to have a manager that was an Afghan national, thick as 2 short planks, the company loved him though, they used positive discrimination, if he had hacked his leg off and said he had lost it standing on a landmine he could have been running the place.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
      Certainly Iraq was no threat to us.
      Not directly but it was certainly a threat to the stability of the middle east
      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        So are you saying that Iraq and Afghanistan would have been far better places to live that they are now? And are you also saying that the world would be a much safer place had there been no intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan

        It is all too simple to brand Bush and Blair as war criminals. It is certainly hip and cool and "caring" to hold this view - apparently but it is sheer cowardice to lay alll the blame at their door.
        The blame lies in not being aware of history.

        The blame lies in the sheer incompetence of Bliar and Bush.

        Do you think that the world is a safer place with the Pakistani Taliban?

        I have no quarrel with the idea of bombing the tulipe of the Afghan hell hole.

        It's the loss of American & UK troops over the intervening 10 years that I object to.

        Iraq is, of course, a rather different question.

        I suspect that the world would be a safer place if the monster was still in power. He kept the lid on things.

        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        Just ignore the "hip and cool" cliches about Blair and Bush being war criminals.
        Er, you're the only one mentioning them as "war criminals".

        I mentioned them as a pair of feckwhits totally unaware of history.

        Not to mention that we'd all be better off if Gadaffi hadn't been offed in the Arab "Spring".
        Last edited by zeitghost; 24 May 2017, 11:55.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
          Not directly but it was certainly a threat to the stability of the middle east
          Well thank God we have America who got right over there and nipped any trouble in the bud.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
            I suspect that the world would be a safer place if the monster was still in power. He kept the lid on things.
            That can be said about a number of dictators.

            Comment


              #16
              So were the locals better off before we went in or are they better off now?
              "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

              https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                So were the locals better off before we went in or are they better off now?
                I reckon they would say it's the same. Still tulipty.

                Which is a bloody disgrace given all the lives lost.
                Bazza gets caught
                Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

                CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                  Not directly but it was certainly a threat to the stability of the middle east
                  Was it? After the Iran-Iraq war of the 80s, which didn't really affect oil supplies, and the invasion of Kuwait, Saddam wasn't going to try anything.
                  He was a counterweight to Iran, which now has too much influence and power.
                  I reckon the middle east is less stable now.
                  Hard Brexit now!
                  #prayfornodeal

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    It says a lot about the Septic idea of "freedom" too.
                    Absolutely.

                    Look what happened when the "Iron Hand" was removed from what was "Yugoslavia", Iraq, Libya, Egypt. These are examples of countries where the "problems" still exist.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                      So were the locals better off before we went in or are they better off now?
                      Good! add in is the world a safer place and then debate the question.

                      Just ignore the "hip and cool" cliches about Blair and Bush being war criminals. These are lefty cliches of total irrelevance.
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X