Originally posted by The Spartan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oh Coffee Bean, Oh Coffee Bean
Collapse
X
-
I remember working on a banking application where I could bypass many of the business rules by using an 'unsupported' browser. IE, Chrome and FF were specified so naturally I did some tests with Safari and found I could do lots of naughty things that could bankrupt the place. PM's standard ****wit response was ' not a valid test as Safari isn't specified'. My response; 'tell that to a fraudster', which didn't make much difference anyway as he was hired by a banker. Why they were implementing business rules at GUI level remains a mystery to me, but the Bob developers probably had their reasons.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
WSS. +1Originally posted by The Spartan View PostI despise the whole certificate issue to it really grips my tulipe, big deal if someone has an intermediate that trumps my foundation
It's putting the theory into practice which can prove difficult for some. I imagine it's the same for dev/dba/PM.
Sadly these days the ones with the 'certs' are chasing the same jobs as those of us with the experience.
(I wonder if Usain Bolt has a GCSE in 'Sports Science'?)Comment
-
I think a good start to selecting testers is to sit them down in front of a screen with an application, give them a list of things they are absolutely NOT allowed to do and see how many of those things they do in half an hour. The ones that do everything on the list probably have the right character to be proper testers, unless of course there's a rule saying ' you're not allowed to murder someone'.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09


Comment