Originally posted by The Spartan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oh Coffee Bean, Oh Coffee Bean
Collapse
X
-
I remember working on a banking application where I could bypass many of the business rules by using an 'unsupported' browser. IE, Chrome and FF were specified so naturally I did some tests with Safari and found I could do lots of naughty things that could bankrupt the place. PM's standard ****wit response was ' not a valid test as Safari isn't specified'. My response; 'tell that to a fraudster', which didn't make much difference anyway as he was hired by a banker. Why they were implementing business rules at GUI level remains a mystery to me, but the Bob developers probably had their reasons.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
WSS. +1Originally posted by The Spartan View PostI despise the whole certificate issue to it really grips my tulipe, big deal if someone has an intermediate that trumps my foundation
It's putting the theory into practice which can prove difficult for some. I imagine it's the same for dev/dba/PM.
Sadly these days the ones with the 'certs' are chasing the same jobs as those of us with the experience.
(I wonder if Usain Bolt has a GCSE in 'Sports Science'?)Comment
-
I think a good start to selecting testers is to sit them down in front of a screen with an application, give them a list of things they are absolutely NOT allowed to do and see how many of those things they do in half an hour. The ones that do everything on the list probably have the right character to be proper testers, unless of course there's a rule saying ' you're not allowed to murder someone'.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment