Originally posted by The Spartan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oh Coffee Bean, Oh Coffee Bean
Collapse
X
-
I remember working on a banking application where I could bypass many of the business rules by using an 'unsupported' browser. IE, Chrome and FF were specified so naturally I did some tests with Safari and found I could do lots of naughty things that could bankrupt the place. PM's standard ****wit response was ' not a valid test as Safari isn't specified'. My response; 'tell that to a fraudster', which didn't make much difference anyway as he was hired by a banker. Why they were implementing business rules at GUI level remains a mystery to me, but the Bob developers probably had their reasons.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
WSS. +1Originally posted by The Spartan View PostI despise the whole certificate issue to it really grips my tulipe, big deal if someone has an intermediate that trumps my foundation
It's putting the theory into practice which can prove difficult for some. I imagine it's the same for dev/dba/PM.
Sadly these days the ones with the 'certs' are chasing the same jobs as those of us with the experience.
(I wonder if Usain Bolt has a GCSE in 'Sports Science'?)Comment
-
I think a good start to selecting testers is to sit them down in front of a screen with an application, give them a list of things they are absolutely NOT allowed to do and see how many of those things they do in half an hour. The ones that do everything on the list probably have the right character to be proper testers, unless of course there's a rule saying ' you're not allowed to murder someone'.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41


Comment