Originally posted by speling bee
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Why should my MP worry about retrospective taxation on avoiders?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Not with public sector contractsOriginally posted by Robinho View PostThere are 3 primary indicators for IR35. Duration is not one of them.Comment
-
I know, he's missed that; he's already alluded to them being legal, but morally wrong....Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostAs a matter of interest, what's dodgy about it?Comment
-
Why should my MP worry about retrospective taxation on avoiders?
NTRT isn't about aggressive tax avoidance schemes, it about retrospective tax legislation.
You can disapprove of the former and still be indignant at the unfairness of the latter.
As I do."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Why should my MP worry about retrospective taxation on avoiders?
And the complaints about retrospective tax demands of Vodafone in India shows how 2-faced the Government is about it."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
But that's not illegal. So apparently it's OK.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostBut you were happy to have a bit of a goad.
Hmmm.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Do what you do, for it has no bearing on me; I just wanted to point out your duplicity mate.Originally posted by speling bee View PostBut that's not illegal. So apparently it's OK.
Loving your defence though, absolutely. Going to pass it on to my 9 yo just to check my theory that she could see through your bluster...Comment
-
Aye, It was chancery to do it and I declined the offer when it was offered to me but chasing people down for houses is chancery.Originally posted by cojak View PostNTRT isn't about aggressive tax avoidance schemes, it about retrospective tax legislation.
You can disapprove of the former and still be indignant at the unfairness of the latter.
As I do.
High horse mentality and multiple "I told you so" posting is arseholery of the highest order.Comment
-
The way I see it is that the tax system in this country is a complete shambles.
There are more tax accountants and tax lawyers in the UK than formally trained Engineers.
It is a shit: state of affairs.Comment
-
Duplicity? Am I paying 3 to 5% tax?Originally posted by Old Hack View PostDo what you do, for it has no bearing on me; I just wanted to point out your duplicity mate.
Loving your defence though, absolutely. Going to pass it on to my 9 yo just to check my theory that she could see through your bluster...The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment