• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Fuel Duty increase

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    No really, I just want them to behave with integrity. Just because they are in politics does not mean they can behave like scumbags.
    Oh Ffs. Do you want to buy some magic beans?

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
      No really, I just want them to behave with integrity. Just because they are in politics does not mean they can behave like scumbags.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
        No really, I just want them to behave with integrity. Just because they are in politics does not mean they can behave like scumbags.
        Why else are they in politics then?
        The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

        George Frederic Watts

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by speling bee View Post
          Why else are they in politics then?
          They do it because that's the best way they can serve their country...

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            no, the idea of opposing everything is a sytemised way of providing a devils advocate, which is a good idea. Anyone who has worked in a management that is stuffed with 'yes men' or 'good news men' will understand that.
            So the job of the opposition is to simply oppose everything the party in power says and does, even if it is something they agree with? I would have thought their job was to produce their own policies and explain why theirs would be better.

            The end results would probably be similar but the intent seems quite different.

            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            And if the government come up with a very popular idea, the opposition claim to have invented it first and say they would have implemented it sooner
            I pretty much said this myself so no argument here.
            "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

            https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
              So the job of the opposition is to simply oppose everything the party in power says and does, even if it is something they agree with? I would have thought their job was to produce their own policies and explain why theirs would be better.

              The end results would probably be similar but the intent seems quite different.
              First off it is not a job, it is a duty. In other words they have an obligation to do it and to do it right.

              there are rules, a budget and they have a lot of rights and also powers.

              your understanding is perfect for parties that are not in government, but that is not the same thing as 'Her majesties loyal opposition', which is the largets party not in government.

              and they do have a duty to oppose



              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
                So the job of the opposition is to simply oppose everything the party in power says and does, even if it is something they agree with? I would have thought their job was to produce their own policies and explain why theirs would be better.

                The end results would probably be similar but the intent seems quite different.



                I pretty much said this myself so no argument here.
                IMO opposition parties are scared of offering up their solutions in case A) they are not liked and they lose votes, or B) they are liked and get used by the party in power for their benefit.

                The Tories were much the same when in opposition, although they agreed to match everything that labour was doing.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                  First off it is not a job, it is a duty. In other words they have an obligation to do it and to do it right.

                  there are rules, a budget and they have a lot of rights and also powers.

                  your understanding is perfect for parties that are not in government, but that is not the same thing as 'Her majesties loyal opposition', which is the largets party not in government.

                  and they do have a duty to oppose

                  Sorry I cannot determine the answer to my question

                  Are you saying that the opposition is obliged to oppose anything and everything that the government in power puts forward, regardless of whether they think it is a good idea - which seemed to be what you said earlier?

                  Or are they producing their own ideas in accordance with their own policies and explaining why they are superior to the governments, or agreeing with the government after due analysis (although I presume this rarely happens)?

                  My assumption was the latter but I do not know much about this.
                  "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                  https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by moggy View Post
                    IMO opposition parties are scared of offering up their solutions in case A) they are not liked and they lose votes, or B) they are liked and get used by the party in power for their benefit.

                    The Tories were much the same when in opposition, although they agreed to match everything that labour was doing.
                    Probably, I was more talking about what the opposition is meant to do rather than what they actually do!
                    "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                    https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                    Comment


                      #40
                      in my view it all fails because they forget the most fundamental part of being an MP

                      you are there to represent the people not for your own self serving aims...

                      until we have honest people as MP's you can forget the government being full of anything but spoilt little tulips whos sole interest is lining their own pockets and spouting absolute bollocks to anyone who points a camera their way.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X