Originally posted by fckvwls
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thursday Puzzle: What are they?
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
-
I protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostGood point but no
NopeAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
What you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.
The four answers are all linked.Comment
-
You're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Originally posted by Pondlife View PostWhat you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.
The four answers are all linked.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Possibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Comment
-
-
REVOLUTION!Originally posted by Pondlife View PostPossibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.
this thread will shortly be hijackedAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment