Originally posted by fckvwls
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thursday Puzzle: What are they?
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
-
I protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostGood point but no
NopeAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
What you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.
The four answers are all linked.Comment
-
You're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Originally posted by Pondlife View PostWhat you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.
The four answers are all linked.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Possibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Comment
-
-
REVOLUTION!Originally posted by Pondlife View PostPossibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.
this thread will shortly be hijackedAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Today 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Yesterday 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40

Comment