Originally posted by fckvwls
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thursday Puzzle: What are they?
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
-
I protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostGood point but no
NopeAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
What you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.
The four answers are all linked.Comment
-
You're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Originally posted by Pondlife View PostWhat you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.
The four answers are all linked.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Possibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Comment
-
-
REVOLUTION!Originally posted by Pondlife View PostPossibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.
this thread will shortly be hijackedAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who the hell is Ethica Resolve — and is it ethical? Today 10:42
- Contractor limited company pension contributions: how to extract profit tax-efficiently? Today 07:44
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Yesterday 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Sep 2 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Sep 2 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27

Comment