Originally posted by fckvwls
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thursday Puzzle: What are they?
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
-
I protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostGood point but no
NopeAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
What you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI protest! Timor is a valid answer to the question; any other judgment than 'correct' is entirely arbitrary and actually somewhat tyrannical. This is a great injustice, visited upon me by the persecutor who started this thread.
The four answers are all linked.Comment
-
You're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Originally posted by Pondlife View PostWhat you say maybe correct but Timor doesn't have anything in common with the other answers. Therefore "close but no cigar" I'm afraid.
The four answers are all linked.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Possibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou're making up the rules as you go along! That's cheating! That's dishonest, lacking in integrity and thoroughly despicable. Do you work in banking?Comment
-
-
REVOLUTION!Originally posted by Pondlife View PostPossibly but not intentionally, not really, never, how very dare you, meh. No.
this thread will shortly be hijackedAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? Today 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? Yesterday 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 04:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10

Comment