Originally posted by dogzilla
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dog attack
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI am sick of trolls running around cuk spouting bollux. They should be neutered.Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
I thought this thread was about someone attacking your missus while you were out dogging.Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostI thought this thread was about someone attacking your missus while you were out dogging.Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
Dog on dog attacks have no relevance in law, there is no legislation that covers it. Dog on person, yes. Dog on dog, no.
In terms of the law with regard to attacks on people the courts will look at whether a dog was out of control. In basic terms this means was it on a lead or not. From there it will examine the behaviour of the owner and what were the circumstances of the attack.
In this case your friend is the one who's dog was under control, the other dog was not. Even if the other guy does go to the police, they will tell him to get lost as no offence has been committed. If he does manage to get them to look into it, possibly by claiming it attacked him, then the fact that your friend had his dog on a lead and under control places the fault with the other guy for not controlling his dog."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
WDBS
Generally dogs of the leash are ones that are thought to be out of control of their owners.
As long as your mate doesn't admit his dog is anti-social there is absolutely no way the other dog owners can get any cash out of him. As the only thing they can try and do is prosecute him privately.
I wish more dog owners trained their dogs properly or kept them on the leash then incidences like this wouldn't happen.
There are a few dog owners in my local park who have trained their dogs not to approach other dogs without their permission. (It's interesting to watch.) Their dogs also don't jump up at people or chase runners and cyclists."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostAll dogs and dog owners should be licensed and taxed
All dogs owners should be tagged.
Owners should only be allowed to keep dogs if they have a garden.
Dogs should be on a lead at all times in public.
Dogs should poo in their owns property and not in parks, playgrounds, pavments etcComment
-
Agree with DaveB.
If a dog comes running up to another that's on a lead, then I was say that the owners of the loose dog need to train their dog better.
I find a lot of the time that it's small dogs that are badly trained - my GSD has been attacked more times than I can count by small mutts (usually westie type things) running up and biting her.Comment
-
Originally posted by suityou01 View PostI'll suggest the muzzle. I think it's a bit harsh as he and the pooch were minding their own business. If I ran up and sniffed someones crotch* and got a slap, would I be surprised?
* not entirely a fair comparison admittedly
I agree with the muzzle comment. We have a dog and he has never ever shown any aggression towards anything...quite the opposite he's the biggest puff going. But if he ever did ever attack any other dog he'd be wearing a muzzle. A dog can attack something before you know it, as in this case. Its not worth the risk. Ask your mate how he'd feel if he were forced to have his dog put down because it attacked another.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
Originally posted by BoredBloke View PostYou are not a dog though. Do you tulip in the garden? Do you lick your balls?
(*) Actually I poo in the neighbours garden“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment