Does it have to be someone dead who cant defend themselves? Something seems very wrong to me in all this.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Jimmy Savile 'household name' sweep
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Is it the mass child rape that seems wrong or something else?Originally posted by escapeUK View PostDoes it have to be someone dead who cant defend themselves? Something seems very wrong to me in all this.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
-
Well, if it's someone alive and you post their name on here, you're at grave risk of civil legal proceedings for libel, and criminal proceedings for contempt of court or obstruction of justice if they're charged. So it's much better to name someone dead precisely because they can't defend themselves.Originally posted by escapeUK View PostDoes it have to be someone dead who cant defend themselves? Something seems very wrong to me in all this.Comment
-
My money is on Saville and Glitter munging a couple of corpses together
Urban Dictionary: corpse mungingComment
-
-
This sort of thing gets on my wick actually. Why not just go out and arrest some household names then, instead of wittering on about it and giving the dross of society license to speculate about anyone and everyone. You'd have thought an element of surprise might be helpful too?Originally posted by Alf W View PostSo, police have announced the imminent arrest of several 'household names' off the back of the Jimmy Savile investigations. Who is your money on?Comment
-
Who wins the prize for prophecy? November 2010.Originally posted by Ketchup View PostMy money is on Saville and Glitter munging a couple of corpses together
Urban Dictionary: corpse munging
Urban Dictionary: gary glitteratiThe material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
It will be a leftie
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
A group of leftiesOriginally posted by Alf W View PostSo, police have announced the imminent arrest of several 'household names' off the back of the Jimmy Savile investigations. Who is your money on?
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18

Comment