Just got a contract through the post and they want £5million of professional indemnity. That seems a little excessive - most providers only offer 1 or 2 million max. Looks like I'm not going to get a tick in that box.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Insurance
Collapse
X
-
Insurance
Last edited by BoredBloke; 16 June 2006, 11:46.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1! -
-
No Substitution clause either!Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
Also don't like this clause
where the Supplier is rejected by the client within the first 4 weeks of the assignment and the agreement is terminated as a result, the supplier shall refund all monies paid to the supplier for the assignment
Does this mean, if the client decides that they don't want me within the first 4 weeks that they can get shut and I have to pay back the money earned and already paid to my company?Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
Only if you're dumb enough to sign the contract
Originally posted by TonyEnglishAlso don't like this clause
where the Supplier is rejected by the client within the first 4 weeks of the assignment and the agreement is terminated as a result, the supplier shall refund all monies paid to the supplier for the assignment
Does this mean, if the client decides that they don't want me within the first 4 weeks that they can get shut and I have to pay back the money earned and already paid to my company?
And given that you're neither SAS or chicken, I doubt you would.Why not?Comment
-
I doubt this is legal, but only an idiot would sign it. Name & shame the agency so we can add to our "avoid like the plague" lists please.Originally posted by TonyEnglishAlso don't like this clause
where the Supplier is rejected by the client within the first 4 weeks of the assignment and the agreement is terminated as a result, the supplier shall refund all monies paid to the supplier for the assignment
Does this mean, if the client decides that they don't want me within the first 4 weeks that they can get shut and I have to pay back the money earned and already paid to my company?His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
The agency is Modis. The contract is a joke.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
That's mad. Whatever you are contracted to do, I'm sure £250K-£500K sum insured is sufficient. Sounds like the customer has pasted in a standard clause to your contract and not thought too deeply on the level of cover. Challenge it politely.Originally posted by TonyEnglishJust got a contract through the post and they want £5million of professional indemnity. That seems a little excessive - most providers only offer 1 or 2 million max. Looks like I'm not going to get a tick in that box."My God, it's huge!!"
Comment
-
Now that I've read the rest of the thread, yes, I'd walk away from this contract,"My God, it's huge!!"
Comment
-
Just spoken to them. The 5 million - oh don't bother about that!! Why is it on the contract if I don't bother about it. Also said I wanted a substitution clause and the clause above taking off. They are sending me an updated contract.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment