Arctic ice melting at 'amazing' speed

[pjclarke]

No there was a published paper (from Steve McIntyre) which showed their analysis was wrong, and Professor Judith Curry atriculates what a lot of scientists think, that deleting data that didn´t suit their analysis was misleading and indefensible.

Nope, there is no such paper. McIntyre has only published once or twice and not on this topic. No data was covertly deleted, read the post by DeepClimate Revisiting TAR Figure 2-21, part 1: Another false claim from Steve McIntyre | Deep Climate

[DodgyAgent]

Nope, there is no such paper. McIntyre has only published once or twice and not on this topic. No data was covertly deleted, read the post by DeepClimate Revisiting TAR Figure 2-21, part 1: Another false claim from Steve McIntyre | Deep Climate

Not an inch will be conceded

[EternalOptimist]

Not an inch will be conceded

The problem with idealogues is that they will countenance a lot of harm 'for the greater good'
they are quite happy to see corn turned into fuel to reduce co2, even though it may mean mass starvation, and even though co2 has not been proven to be an evil thing

its a bit scary really.

the end justifies the means.

seig heil

[pjclarke]

Not an inch will be conceded

People make stuff up ('there was a published paper','inconvenient data was deleted'). I point out it's made up. You got a problem with that?

[BlasterBates]

People make stuff up ('there was a published paper','inconvenient data was deleted'). I point out it's made up. You got a problem with that?

Who do you believe, Professor Judith Curry, an esteemed climate scientist who has presented to the US congress, or pjclarke ?

I think everyone can make their own decision.

[pjclarke]

Who do you believe?

Good question. In response to IR35 saying the ClimateGate/UEA debacle was media representation, you stated that there was a paper published by (Steve) McIntyre proving that 'their analysis was wrong'.

McIntyre has published a handful of studies, but none of them relates to the work of the UEA Climate Research Unit, which was the source of the Climategate leak (and none that in any way undermines the evidence for AGW).

So - give us the title of the McIntyre paper that demonstrates the the UEA 'analysis is wrong' and the journal in which it was published. You won't - you can't 'cos no such paper exists. Will you concede this fact and apologise? I think we know the answer.

When asked for evidence to support your defamatory accusation that Dr Curry had accused 'The scientists who run Real Climate' of fraud and you produced a blog quote about work that largely pre-dated the formation of RC, was mainly by scientists (Briffa, Jones) who have nothing to do with RC and was factually inaccurate.

And, in the face of all the data, you'd like people to believe that there is more sea ice in the Arctic now than in 2007, based only on a dataset never designed or calibrated for multi-year comparisons.

People will indeed be making their minds up.

[DodgyAgent]

People make stuff up ('there was a published paper','inconvenient data was deleted'). I point out it's made up. You got a problem with that?

I have a problem with any fanatic

[BlasterBates]

Just a reminder that the earth isn´t the only planet whose ice caps have been shrinking lately:

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says

[sasguru]

FFS Another 8 pages of dross. The arctic ice cap is at the lowest level ever. That is a fooking fact however you argue about it. And the usual cretins are on here again: a third rate wannabee rockabilly band member and a fooking agent. Basically thick fookkers. FFS

[Scoobos]

Who do you believe, Professor Judith Curry, a single esteemed climate scientist who has presented to the US congress, or every single UN Climate Change scientist, nobel prize winners?I think everyone can make their own decision.

HTH