Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What's the deal with the *******?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
Oh. Hmm. Well she didn't upset me anyway.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Not necessarily. I just think it applies to a lot of people on this forum who have got no life and nothing better to do than abuse people on an internet forum.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostAre you including Gentile in that?
Bully.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI didn't see what she did to upset people either. What's happened?Not quite true Mr bee.Originally posted by speling bee View PostIt seems as if she said that there were no posh areas in London and declined to retract it or apologise, or something like that anyway. Obviously that was sufficient to unleash sexual bullying from some of the less adequate posters.
She decided to have a go at me, totally unprovoked by me, I might add. I've never had any interaction with her. Whatever spat she is having with Spod is nothing to do with me. Whatever spat anyone is having with him is nothing to do with me.
She then went on to complain about CUK - although somehow missed the fact that she was complaining about the very way she decided to have a go at me.
"Actually, I think the comments that've been made over an extended period of time on here by a small number of people have been vicious, and unwarranted, regardless of their applicability. And I'm sure the people who voiced them believed them at the time.
Whether a given slur is true or not is irrelevant. It's a bit like calling someone a "poof", "dyke" or a racial slur based solely on an uninformed perception of them. At the end of the day it doesn't matter what the target of the comment is or isn't. What matters is that the person making the comment holds those sentiments. A bigot's behaviour doesn't become more or less acceptable by virtue of whether their target is fit for them or not."Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
BTW Mods/Admin - I know the original thread is closed, so sorry if this opens up a can of worms.Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
Originally posted by cailin maith View PostBTW Mods/Admin - I know the original thread is closed, so sorry if this opens up a can of worms.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
I think I tend to miss these incidents because I can't be bothered reading the personal fight threads.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Which begs the question; why are you in General?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI think I tend to miss these incidents because I can't be bothered reading the personal fight threads.Coffee's for closersComment
-
To be fair she did apologise AND admit she was in the wrong, and I can't remember the last time I saw an unconditional apology on CUK.Originally posted by cailin maith View PostNot quite true Mr bee.
She decided to have a go at me, totally unprovoked by me, I might add. I've never had any interaction with her. Whatever spat she is having with Spod is nothing to do with me. Whatever spat anyone is having with him is nothing to do with me.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Pictures of fit birds.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostWhich begs the question; why are you in General?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I don't know why I'm in CUK General. I wanted to be an astronaut when I was younger; now I'm a tester pissing around in CUK General and I really don't know what I did to deserve this.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostWhich begs the question; why are you in General?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment