• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

NYSE head: speed isn't always good

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    I dont know much about the ice cream market, and I dont know much about HST, but if people are making money BECAUSE of the speed, then I can see that being a big problem



    How so?

    The Atlantic Telegraph Cable was used to great effect in trading in the mid to late 19th Century.
    Last edited by SupremeSpod; 6 August 2012, 08:43. Reason: Got my Centuries mixed up... Ooops.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      How so?

      The Atlantic Telegraph Cable was used to great effect in trading in the mid to late 18th Century.
      because then profit becomes a function of technology.


      the winner of WOW becomes the one with the fastest connection


      the kid best at football is the one wearing the latest man U rooney kit



      (\__/)
      (>'.'<)
      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
        because then profit becomes a function of technology.


        the winner of WOW becomes the one with the fastest connection


        the kid best at football is the one wearing the latest man U rooney kit



        If you provide the fastest technology then all will have to buy or be left behind, it's "MAD"

        Spod - In "Making Hay while the sun shines" mode!

        Comment


          #24
          The trading systems I have worked on have all had limits on the transactions (per counter party, per trader, per location etc.).

          This type of problem already has a standard solution. Knights Capital were negligent to not have this safeguard in place and paid the price (literally).

          Am I missing something?
          "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

          https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
            The trading systems I have worked on have all had limits on the transactions (per counter party, per trader, per location etc.).

            This type of problem already has a standard solution. Knights Capital were negligent to not have this safeguard in place and paid the price (literally).

            Am I missing something?
            Yes the fact they missed adding those safeguards to the system as that was extra work.
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #26
              Is this chappy trying to say that it's not necessarily a good thing if trades that risk bigger sums of money than some of the parties can survive can be executed before those parties have been able to think about what they're doing?

              If so, I'm inclined to agree with him.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment

              Working...
              X