• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Revealed: why Gordon Brown sold Britain's gold at a knock-down price

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I don't really understand the fuss. 400 tons of gold is only worth about £20bn which would be nice to have in the bank but it's bugger all in the grand scheme of things.
    £1500 isn't much in the grand scheme of a contractor's bank balance.

    Would you give that £1500 to me if I paid you £300 for it?

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by doodab View Post
      I don't really understand the fuss. 400 tons of gold is only worth about £20bn which would be nice to have in the bank but it's bugger all in the grand scheme of things.
      It's the question of competence, or more like incompetence in this case.

      He thrown far more money in other mistakes such as PFI.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
        £1500 isn't much in the grand scheme of a contractor's bank balance.

        Would you give that £1500 to me if I paid you £300 for it?
        No, but I wouldn't give you tuppence. If however you wanted to buy some of my old junk for £300 and it turns out to be worth £1500 in a few years time then good luck to you.

        The sentiment that gold is now basically useless so may as well get rid and use the cash for something else was actually quite sensible IMO, and an awful lot of central banks were doing the same thing and kept doing it for years afterwards. The timing of the sale was bad, yes, although it looks a lot worse in the light of the financial crisis and even now with gold close to all time highs the loss equates to only 6 weeks of the current deficit, so I think we have much more important things to worry about.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #14
          Oh dear...

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            He thrown far more money in other mistakes such as PFI.
            Exactly, why keep harping on about a few billion quids worth of gold when there are hundreds of billions of pounds worth of far more serious ****ery to concern ourselves with.

            You could also argue to some extent that the utility privatizations resulted in a similar loss to the taxpayer.
            Last edited by doodab; 7 July 2012, 22:55.
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #16
              So we are agreed then, the "one eyed Scottish idiot" was yet another glorified Labour cockhead? Yes?
              If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

              Comment


                #17
                Yeah, a drop in the ocean compared to the £1/3 trillion money printing operation, with another £50 billion printed this week.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post

                  Exactly, why keep harping on about a few billion quids worth of gold when there are hundreds of billions of pounds worth of far more serious ****ery to concern ourselves with.
                  Isn't it obvious? Because pallet loads of gleaming gold bars are easy to visualise, and everyone knows it is "precious", and hoards of it are in the common imagination the bulwark of a healthy stable economy. So selling that at a knock down price is a potent symbol or representative of his other follies.

                  PFI by contrast sounds all technical and abstruse to many, and the losses less clear cut. Also, PFI sounds more like a planned strategy, worked out by clever civil servants, whereas selling the gold seemed and presumably was a sudden act of desperation.
                  Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
                    So we are agreed then, the "one eyed Scottish idiot" was yet another glorified Labour cockhead? Yes?
                    I don't believe being Labour had anything to do with it. Look at the current bunch of incumbents.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Who is Gordon Brown? And what is Gold? I only watch Justin Bieber.
                      <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X