Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Answer the question. Is the scheme currently as of 19/06/2012 illegal? Yes or No?
Why do you care if I think it's illegal? It won't affect that case - HMRC will decide on it and little Jimmy might spend next 10 years fighting it up till the point Supreme Court tells him to fook right off. I am for one will have a good laugh all the way
Why do you care if I think it's illegal? It won't affect that case - HMRC will decide on it and little Jimmy might spend next 10 years fighting it up till the point Supreme Court tells him to fook right off. I am for one will have a good laugh all the way
By all means. However currently he is doing nothing illegal. Looks like we're in agreement.
Saying that something that is so clearly wrong and deliberate is fine because it's not illegal, is saying that Gary Glitter is ok, because what he did was not illegal in Laos, or whatever country he uses that doesnt have a law.
As much as I like the guy, and also resent HMRC wasting our billions, there's not a lot of justifying how its "ok" for someone so vocal against the big tax dodgers to do it himself.
Saying that something that is so clearly wrong and deliberate is fine because it's not illegal, is saying that Gary Glitter is ok, because what he did was not illegal in Laos, or whatever country he uses that doesnt have a law.
As much as I like the guy, and also resent HMRC wasting our billions, there's not a lot of justifying how its "ok" for someone so vocal against the big tax dodgers to do it himself.
Come on....
Tax avoidance is not illegal. Use whatever distasteful analogies you wish but don't forget the difference between avoidance and evasion.
Just because something is legal in a country does not make it fine; that is the point I'm trying to make.
The same way you are saying that because its legal, its avoidance not evasion.. I'm not sure with large scale specialist schemes like this that you can , hand on heart, say you think its playing by the rules or finding a little loophole.
By all means. However currently he is doing nothing illegal. Looks like we're in agreement.
How do you know it's not illega? It has not been ruled by court as illegal, however that might not even be necessary since HMRC can fall back to "this scheme does not work" and instead of going for tax evasion (which would require illegality) they'll just go for unpaid tax + penalties enough to wipe the smile off his face forever.
AFAIK if he is not paying market interest rate on loan every year (7-20% pa) then it's a sham loan in my view and should be treated as such.
How do you know it's not illega? It has not been ruled by court as illegal, however that might not even be necessary since HMRC can fall back to "this scheme does not work" and instead of going for tax evasion (which would require illegality) they'll just go for unpaid tax + penalties enough to wipe the smile off his face forever.
AFAIK if he is not paying market interest rate on loan every year (7-20% pa) then it's a sham loan in my view and should be treated as such.
Unlike Russia one is innocent until proven guilty. It is certainly not for a sanctimonious nutter like you to decide.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone
Unlike Russia one is innocent until proven guilty. It is certainly not for a sanctimonious nutter like you to decide.
Not even in Soviet Union prosecution relied on self-incrimination - I thought about it when I had to fill in details about who was driving my car at the time of alleged speeding
I hope HMRC will fook him over for all he's got - taxes are not a laughing matter.
Comment