• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Congratulations, 60 years!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Less monarchy means more professional politicians. Would that be a good thing?

    Comment


      #52
      Would the UK be a more interesting place without its monarchy? More colourful and interesting?

      Comment


        #53
        There's talk of naming the tower at the Houses of Parliament the Elizabeth Tower. Maybe they should call it Big Beth.

        (Technically Big Ben is just the bell inside it, named after Sir Benjamin Hall.)
        Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
          Less monarchy means more professional politicians. Would that be a good thing?
          why would no monarchy mean more politicians?
          Coffee's for closers

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
            Given the massive crowds of people who appear at anything to do with the Queen and immediate royal family, I wouldn't say it's that irrelevant.
            Lots of people turn out to see Jedward, but that doesn't mean they should be given a life of privilege and power at tax payers expense, let alone given a constitutional role theoretically sitting above the democratically elected government.
            Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
              Lots of people turn out to see Jedward, but that doesn't mean they should be given a life of privilege and power at tax payers expense, let alone given a constitutional role theoretically sitting above the democratically elected government.
              Don't be stupid. They're Irish and Ireland's a republic
              Coffee's for closers

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                Don't be stupid. They're Irish and Ireland's a republic
                Simon Cowell's popular, holds a UK passport and no doubt more gets more viewers than any show Charles puts on. People also spend millions enjoying his output. Should he be next in line?

                Comment


                  #58
                  Never met any royalty and likely never will so no opinion what they're like as people although a friend of mine was decorated by the queen and the video shows her giggling away at a comment he made in response to a question she asked. He thinks she's a star.

                  I can't get it into my head that royalty should exist in the times we live in nor the titles that many people have attached, what is the point of that?

                  Forget tourism, build a theme park and get visitors, Buckingham Palace as a hotel would make a fortune just for what it is and that goes for every other royal residence. I've not heard a single good reason why we or any other country should have a monarchy.
                  Me, me, me...

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                    Don't be stupid. They're Irish and Ireland's a republic
                    So is Germany.
                    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Philip in hospital. linky

                      Hope he's bought a card for the telly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X