Following yesterday's false headline in the Telegraph about the g-spot (well caught NF) I read this article :-
New York woman 'sacked after donating kidney to save boss's life' - Telegraph
The headline says "New York woman 'sacked after donating kidney to save boss's life' "
But the article says "Stevens's kidney was not a good match for Brucia, but she agreed to donate it to a stranger in St. Louis, Missouri, setting up a transplant chain that enabled Brucia to receive a better-matched kidney from a donor in San Francisco. ".
So there was no direct donation as implied.
And its very odd to donate a kidney to a stranger. KIdney transplant is a big op.....
New York woman 'sacked after donating kidney to save boss's life' - Telegraph
The headline says "New York woman 'sacked after donating kidney to save boss's life' "
But the article says "Stevens's kidney was not a good match for Brucia, but she agreed to donate it to a stranger in St. Louis, Missouri, setting up a transplant chain that enabled Brucia to receive a better-matched kidney from a donor in San Francisco. ".
So there was no direct donation as implied.
And its very odd to donate a kidney to a stranger. KIdney transplant is a big op.....
Comment