• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Abu Qatada al-Filistini

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    And how come he gets to live in a great big council house when I wouldn't even make it on to the waiting list. When he's not in prison that is.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
      My wife is currently working on one such case at the moment.
      And there I was worrying that your 6-year old non-taxpayer would be defenseless in case my plan of taxpayers only get legal aid goes ahead

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
        Acts that name individuals in this way such as an Act of Attainder have fallen out of use.
        "Previously secret British War Cabinet papers released on 1 January 2006 have shown that, as early as December 1942, the War Cabinet had discussed their policy for the punishment of the leading Nazis if captured. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill had then advocated a policy of summary execution with the use of an Act of Attainder to circumvent legal obstacles. He was dissuaded from this by cabinet minister Richard Law who pointed out that the United States and Soviet Union still favoured trials.[7]"

        Bill of attainder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        Churchill had balls which is why he was the greatest UK leader of last century and possibly the best PM this country had. He certainly would not be deterred in this case.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          "Previously secret British War Cabinet papers released on 1 January 2006 have shown that, as early as December 1942, the War Cabinet had discussed their policy for the punishment of the leading Nazis if captured. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill had then advocated a policy of summary execution with the use of an Act of Attainder to circumvent legal obstacles. He was dissuaded from this by cabinet minister Richard Law who pointed out that the United States and Soviet Union still favoured trials.[7]"

          Bill of attainder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          Churchill had balls which is why he was the greatest UK leader of last century and possibly the best PM this country had. He certainly would not be deterred in this case.
          So did he do it?

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
            So did he do it?
            No, but he had balls to propose it, albeit secretly. The reason he did not do it I guess is because USA and USSR wanted trials. It's the coalition thing ...

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              No, but he had balls to propose it, albeit secretly. The reason he did not do it I guess is because USA and USSR wanted trials. It's the coalition thing ...
              So how do you apply that single proposal over the last 300 years which referenced Nazi war criminals to the matter in question?

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                So how do you apply that single proposal over the last 300 years which referenced Nazi war criminals to the matter in question?
                If I was running things such problem with deporting a few non-UK citizens would not even be on the agenda

                Comment


                  #88
                  If Maggie was back she'd sort it out
                  Confusion is a natural state of being

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    It's not slow at all, they have regular referendums and force politicians to do things nobody else in Europe would, that's ****ing democracy... and oh they trust citizens to have firearms, low taxes also - what's not to like?!?!
                    no it is slow

                    Regarding firearms they trust them with the rifles but not so much the ammo. Its a hot potato at the moment a number of high profile murders and suicides are putting an end to that

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by Diver View Post
                      If Maggie was back she'd sort it out
                      If Tony was around he's sort out a seat on JPMorgan's board as compensation.
                      McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
                      Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X