And how come he gets to live in a great big council house when I wouldn't even make it on to the waiting list. When he's not in prison that is.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Abu Qatada al-Filistini
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
And there I was worrying that your 6-year old non-taxpayer would be defenseless in case my plan of taxpayers only get legal aid goes aheadOriginally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostMy wife is currently working on one such case at the moment.
Comment
-
"Previously secret British War Cabinet papers released on 1 January 2006 have shown that, as early as December 1942, the War Cabinet had discussed their policy for the punishment of the leading Nazis if captured. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill had then advocated a policy of summary execution with the use of an Act of Attainder to circumvent legal obstacles. He was dissuaded from this by cabinet minister Richard Law who pointed out that the United States and Soviet Union still favoured trials.[7]"Originally posted by Old Greg View PostActs that name individuals in this way such as an Act of Attainder have fallen out of use.
Bill of attainder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Churchill had balls which is why he was the greatest UK leader of last century and possibly the best PM this country had. He certainly would not be deterred in this case.Comment
-
So did he do it?Originally posted by AtW View Post"Previously secret British War Cabinet papers released on 1 January 2006 have shown that, as early as December 1942, the War Cabinet had discussed their policy for the punishment of the leading Nazis if captured. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill had then advocated a policy of summary execution with the use of an Act of Attainder to circumvent legal obstacles. He was dissuaded from this by cabinet minister Richard Law who pointed out that the United States and Soviet Union still favoured trials.[7]"
Bill of attainder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Churchill had balls which is why he was the greatest UK leader of last century and possibly the best PM this country had. He certainly would not be deterred in this case.Comment
-
No, but he had balls to propose it, albeit secretly. The reason he did not do it I guess is because USA and USSR wanted trials. It's the coalition thing ...Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo did he do it?Comment
-
So how do you apply that single proposal over the last 300 years which referenced Nazi war criminals to the matter in question?Originally posted by AtW View PostNo, but he had balls to propose it, albeit secretly. The reason he did not do it I guess is because USA and USSR wanted trials. It's the coalition thing ...Comment
-
If I was running things such problem with deporting a few non-UK citizens would not even be on the agendaOriginally posted by Old Greg View PostSo how do you apply that single proposal over the last 300 years which referenced Nazi war criminals to the matter in question?
Comment
-
Comment
-
no it is slowOriginally posted by AtW View PostIt's not slow at all, they have regular referendums and force politicians to do things nobody else in Europe would, that's ****ing democracy... and oh they trust citizens to have firearms, low taxes also - what's not to like?!?!
Regarding firearms they trust them with the rifles but not so much the ammo. Its a hot potato at the moment a number of high profile murders and suicides are putting an end to thatComment
-
If Tony was around he's sort out a seat on JPMorgan's board as compensation.Originally posted by Diver View PostIf Maggie was back she'd sort it outMcCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment