I think this guy should go back to court and point out that her commitment to the marriage also included keeping the house clean and tidy as well as conjugal duties which he expects her to sustain as long as his payment does!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
oh dear: Ex-wives win key divorce rulings
Collapse
X
-
I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time -
Huh?Originally posted by AtWMorale of the story - marry some girl who works at the checkouts for min salary...
In Miller's case, married less than 3 years, he's having to fork over a third of his savings simply because she had an "expectation of a significantly better standard of living"Comment
-
IMO that's really taking the piss.Originally posted by Joe Blackbecause she had an "expectation of a significantly better standard of living"
Comment
-
The real problem with the miller case is that the judge took in to consideration the guy had f*cked around on his wife. The judgement sounded like the guy was punished for playing away from home, not for the woman losing her earning potential because she was looking after kids...oh thats right...they didnt have kids so what exactly has she been doing for the last three years! (obviously not blowing her husband!
)
However I agree with the second case as they had been married for 18 years and she most likely did actually contribute a hell of a lot to running the house and family over that time.
MailmanComment
-
Agreed and nice ezboard emoticon.Originally posted by AtWIMO that's really taking the piss.
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
The knock on effect from this ruling is going to be really bad.
When I get divorced I will make sure that I have nothing left in the bank - stick it all under some floorboards is the only way.Comment
-
I think these rulings only go to support my assertion that the UK divorce system is designed to maximise lawyer income.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Mailman, I know your parents haven't taken you through the birds and bees yet, but I feel obliged to point out that blowing your husband off can't result in a pregnancy.Originally posted by Mailmanoh thats right...they didnt have kids so what exactly has she been doing for the last three years! (obviously not blowing her husband!
)I'm Spartacus.Comment
-
Originally posted by Shimano105When I get divorced I will make sure that I have nothing left in the bank - stick it all under some floorboards is the only way.
Not taking this marriage-for-life thing seriously then, are we?
Comment
-
Well, this may land you in prison for lieing to court - and they will still get the money.Originally posted by Shimano105When I get divorced I will make sure that I have nothing left in the bank - stick it all under some floorboards is the only way.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment