I think this guy should go back to court and point out that her commitment to the marriage also included keeping the house clean and tidy as well as conjugal duties which he expects her to sustain as long as his payment does!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
oh dear: Ex-wives win key divorce rulings
Collapse
X
-
I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time -
Huh?Originally posted by AtWMorale of the story - marry some girl who works at the checkouts for min salary...
In Miller's case, married less than 3 years, he's having to fork over a third of his savings simply because she had an "expectation of a significantly better standard of living"Comment
-
IMO that's really taking the piss.Originally posted by Joe Blackbecause she had an "expectation of a significantly better standard of living"
Comment
-
The real problem with the miller case is that the judge took in to consideration the guy had f*cked around on his wife. The judgement sounded like the guy was punished for playing away from home, not for the woman losing her earning potential because she was looking after kids...oh thats right...they didnt have kids so what exactly has she been doing for the last three years! (obviously not blowing her husband!
)
However I agree with the second case as they had been married for 18 years and she most likely did actually contribute a hell of a lot to running the house and family over that time.
MailmanComment
-
Agreed and nice ezboard emoticon.Originally posted by AtWIMO that's really taking the piss.
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
The knock on effect from this ruling is going to be really bad.
When I get divorced I will make sure that I have nothing left in the bank - stick it all under some floorboards is the only way.Comment
-
I think these rulings only go to support my assertion that the UK divorce system is designed to maximise lawyer income.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Mailman, I know your parents haven't taken you through the birds and bees yet, but I feel obliged to point out that blowing your husband off can't result in a pregnancy.Originally posted by Mailmanoh thats right...they didnt have kids so what exactly has she been doing for the last three years! (obviously not blowing her husband!
)I'm Spartacus.Comment
-
Originally posted by Shimano105When I get divorced I will make sure that I have nothing left in the bank - stick it all under some floorboards is the only way.
Not taking this marriage-for-life thing seriously then, are we?
Comment
-
Well, this may land you in prison for lieing to court - and they will still get the money.Originally posted by Shimano105When I get divorced I will make sure that I have nothing left in the bank - stick it all under some floorboards is the only way.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08

Comment