Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I am considering upgrading my John Stock wet full plate camera to a dry half plate. Will the contact images be as good? Does the sepia tone come as a extra?
HEALTH WARNING. IT Can Damage your Health. Free Advice. Advice in the forum is the £9,995 version. By reading the health warning you are agreeing to the terms and conditions. Advice maybe bad as well as good. 24 months interest free. Your home is at risk if you don’t keep up payments. Advice limited to availability.
I am considering upgrading my John Stock wet full plate camera to a dry half plate. Will the contact images be as good? Does the sepia tone come as a extra?
I'm considering upgrading my easel to a self levelling one with a stand for a tea cup. Are the new fanlged acrylic paints any good?
I'm a keen artist and am finding the wall of my cave and coloured rock crushed and mixed with water is limiting my creativity. What could anyone suggest as the next logical step?
with the 18-70mm lens. does any member of the assembly have any experience of this camera? good/bad/indifferent? it's this or the canon 350d on the shortlist and so far, the nikon is frontrunner.
Have used the D70s (big brother of the D50) and it was a pleasure to use, gave excellent results. Assume D50 would be similar, less a few bells and whistles.
Phil Askey at http://www.dpreview.com/ is the last word on camera reviews so his D50 / 350d reviews will be worth a read.
Personally I don't like Canon DSLR cameras, even though they seem to be replacing Nikon in the pro arena. The ergonomics seem crap to me compared to a Nikon.
The low-end Canons feel horrible and cheap. The low end Nikons seem well made and solid.
Image quality is very slightly better (less noisey) on the Canon, allegedly, but both produce superb images in 99% of shooting conditions.
I'd go with the Nikon, but check out the Olympus E series too.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
I'd go with the Nikon, but check out the Olympus E series too.
The latest Olympus deals are extremely good value, and the cameras are nice and small, and have built-in dust removal that keeps the sensor clean. But they are not so good if you want to get serious due to a smaller range of lenses, and the smaller sensor.
You could also pop in to W H Smiths and thumb through the photo-mags. They usually have best buy guides in the back.
I'm a keen artist and am finding the wall of my cave and coloured rock crushed and mixed with water is limiting my creativity. What could anyone suggest as the next logical step?
Evolution. I'd give it a million years if I were you.
Comment