Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Another brilliant idea from the DWP
Collapse
X
-
-
It failed to land correctly after getting close to Mars, wtf launching got to do with it?Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostAh, just checked and it was a Russian rocket, so maybe it wasn't the Yanks after all.
Beagle 2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaComment
-
Remember the bull about using open source they were spouting.
Dr Mark Thompson...
Osborne...These new standards would enable large-scale IT projects to be split into small modular components, meaning that the UK government should never again need to sign an IT software contract worth over £100 million – so no more IT ‘white elephants’.
http://www.conservatives.com/News/Ne..._software.aspx“We have led the debate on using open source software in government, and I’m delighted that Dr Mark Thompson has come forward with these detailed recommendations. These proposals aren’t just about saving money – they’re about modernising government, making the public sector more innovative and improving public services.”
3 years later they are singing up to another couple of doom projects.Comment
-
Some pesky Rusky could have snipped its antenna. IIRC, we don't know that it failed to land.Originally posted by AtW View PostIt failed to land correctly after getting close to Mars, wtf launching got to do with it?
Beagle 2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaComment
-
Well, what we know is that it detached successfully from the mothership whilst being in orbit on Mars and then never was heard ofOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostSome pesky Rusky could have snipped its antenna. IIRC, we don't know that it failed to land.
Comment
-
The reason I thought the Yanks is because they had a Mars mission on the go at the same time and I recalled Pillinger saying someone had let him down and I thought the Yanks were mentioned. It turns out the only Yank involvement is that Pillinger was going to phone them up, yes by using a phone, to ask them if they could please turn their receivers to the Beagle and see if it was calling home. All very sad. Pillinger blames ESA for something related to his mistake in not leaving the transmitter on permanently rather than after touchdown. Forget the details.Originally posted by AtW View PostWell, what we know is that it detached successfully from the mothership whilst being in orbit on Mars and then never was heard of
Comment
-
....
Yes, but we are funding it one way or another lol it doesn't matter if it goes up in smoke when you don't have to pay for it...Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostComment
-
All I heard was a passing flippent comment from a then senior manager who had said we wrote something to handle x and they interfaced in to something else in Y. Was quite serious at the time. I think a few of the directors thought they were about to have to call in their insurers to pay for a whole satellite programmeOriginally posted by AtW View PostWell, what we know is that it detached successfully from the mothership whilst being in orbit on Mars and then never was heard of

Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36


Comment