• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Open letter to those who think that the word "Paki" is illegal.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Closing your mind to the opinions of others doesn't do you any credit. In this debate you sound like a child in a playground.
    Hello Wim

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
      You spout gibberish about ladyboys, pedophiles and now incest. You use this to defend the BNP, it isn't working, the argument was poor in the first place, the insults just make you look immature and a bit silly.

      From other posts of yours, you appear to have no empathy at all for the rest of humanity, and quite a lot of pent up hatred, all at such a young age. It begs the question what was done to you, it must have been pretty bad.
      I am not sure it isnt working. BNP have some valid points about immigration but the rest of the political world try to bury any of these points by calling them extreme racists. The whole reason for their disproportionate success is because there are legitimate problems with immigration that no one dares to discuss for fear of being branded a as such -BNP is thus elevated to the position of representing the views of such people who otherwise remain unheard.

      If the BNP are going to have their members criminal records held up as evidence of their racism or to undermine the credibility of their arguments then it is only fair that the criminal records of other MPs be also held up.
      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
        Closing your mind to the opinions of others doesn't do you any credit. In this debate you sound like a child in a playground.
        Yes, quite Doggy.

        Couldn't agree more.

        Don't really like the BNP but Wim certainly highlighted some examples of double standards and hypocracy in the left's smears on the party when recently one of their own was convicted of thuggery in the House of Commons no less.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by pacharan View Post
          Yes, quite Doggy.

          Couldn't agree more.

          Don't really like the BNP but Wim certainly highlighted some examples of double standards and hypocracy in the left's smears on the party when recently one of their own was convicted of thuggery in the House of Commons no less.
          Hear Hear, Wim conducted himself ever so well. He's the bestest arguer ever and an all round good egg.

          Now what is the login for the next sockpuppet
          Lick my Chutney Lollipop

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by sasguru View Post
            You seem mentally unbalanced. Get help.
            HTH
            So sasguru has moved on from the cretin response - mentally unbalanced is the new cretin.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
              Closing your mind to the opinions of others doesn't do you any credit. In this debate you sound like a child in a playground.
              Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
              Hello Wim
              I rest my case.

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Wim121 View Post
                What are you smoking you queer little man?

                go back to porking your father instead of interjecting in others conversations.

                There are many from other parties who are convicted kiddy fiddlers/sex criminals or just enjoy dubious abusive sex with eastern lady boys.
                In defense of Wim

                Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
                Closing your mind to the opinions of others doesn't do you any credit. In this debate you sound like a child in a playground.


                Last edited by ZARDOZ; 15 March 2012, 11:10.

                Comment


                  #88
                  My conclusion is DoggyStyles is Wim, Pacharan and possibly Gricer.

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    I am not sure it isnt working. BNP have some valid points about immigration but the rest of the political world try to bury any of these points by calling them extreme racists. The whole reason for their disproportionate success is because there are legitimate problems with immigration that no one dares to discuss for fear of being branded a as such -BNP is thus elevated to the position of representing the views of such people who otherwise remain unheard.

                    If the BNP are going to have their members criminal records held up as evidence of their racism or to undermine the credibility of their arguments then it is only fair that the criminal records of other MPs be also held up.
                    But the BNP select candidates with records of crimes that are political in their nature. E.g. posting razor blades to prominent Jews.

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
                      My conclusion is DoggyStyles is Wim, Pacharan and possibly Gricer.
                      Zardoz (beat me to the sockie title btw) is MF?
                      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X