• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

50% tax rate is damaging the economy.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Maybe you could follow Mr. Cameron on Twitter.
    I lead, not follow.

    HTH

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      It's pissing off a lot of people who have money and who already contribute a lot - for some of them with NI factored in their effective tax is easily around 70% (due to anomaly of removing personal allowance for earnings over £100k).

      I can't remember them saying 40% was big problem but if those people say 50% tax is a problem them then situation should be addressed because it is those people who can and should drive economic recovery.
      Their marginal rate of tax is not around 70%, because one has to be earning > £150k to be paying 50% tax and the loss of personal allowance is a distant memory at that point.

      One guy reckons he avoided making investments that would have employed 12 people because of it. To employ 12 people for 20 hours a week on minimum wage costs £90k. He runs care homes, so we can guess that the investment required was somewhat more than this, lets say £400k. Are we seriously to believe that he decided not to make this investment because the pay off on his investment was going to be taxed at 42.5% instead of 32.5% for the next few years? Or is it because the higher tax rate meant that he didn't have the money to invest because he needs to pay himself an extra £400k a year in order to maintain his standard of living? Neither of those scenarios seem very plausible to me.
      Last edited by doodab; 1 March 2012, 21:29.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by doodab View Post
        There effective tax is not around 70%
        It is, read up on it:



        Factor into this NI (employee and employer) and true tax rate is around 70% for those people who are not even in 50% bracket.

        Source: BBC News - If we can have a single benefit, why not a single tax?

        Taking more than half in direct income taxes from what people earn is taking the piss and as it appears won't contribute that much extra anyway.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          It is, read up on it:
          I did. The original article itself states that their marginal rate of tax is 58% after NI. That includes employers NI.

          BTW, effective rate of tax is different than marginal rate. Marginal rate = rate of tax on additional income. Effective rate = total tax paid / total income.
          Last edited by doodab; 1 March 2012, 21:43.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by doodab View Post
            I did. The original article itself states that their marginal rate of tax is 58% after NI. That includes employers NI.
            It's way too much - more than half of earned money taken as direct tax. Not even in communist USSR they did such tulip.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              It's way too much - more than half of earned money taken as direct tax. Not even in communist USSR they did such tulip.
              I agree it isn't fair but I don't believe it's harming the economy as they say it is.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by doodab View Post
                I agree it isn't fair but I don't believe it's harming the economy as they say it is.
                I'll think about it over a pint of Guiness - every little helps the economy!

                Comment

                Working...
                X