• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

I may have to buy one

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Amazon have the Crucial M4 512GB for £514 and some pence at the moment.
    I'd be tempted too. Really tempted.

    Think I'll replace the drive in the 24-inch, Late 2006 iMac first though. Still using this machine daily with only 2g ram. But with an SSD, oohh
    "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

    Comment


      #12
      About 20 times the price of a HDD per GB.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by PRC1964 View Post
        512Gb is fine. I've just found out that Windows doesn't like backing up onto drives over 2Tb

        Now WTF do I do with the 2 x 2.5Tb external drives I've just bought do do backups onto?
        Why not set them up in raid? Data redundancy is almost the same as backing up anyway ...



        NB: I dont see why people back up from one medium like mechanical HDD's to another mechanical HDD. All my backups are done to a tape drive, then stored at a relatives house.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
          About 20 times the price of a HDD per GB.
          About twice the price as SAS per GB, with 20 times the IOPS and no adapter required.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by wim121 View Post
            I dont see why people back up from one medium like mechanical HDD's to another mechanical HDD. All my backups are done to a tape drive, then stored at a relatives house.
            Why do people still backup to physical media? I keep all documents in the cloud, and my NAS drive backsup to amazon S3. Hardware requirements are low and my machines are largely disposable.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by PRC1964 View Post
              512Gb is fine. I've just found out that Windows doesn't like backing up onto drives over 2Tb

              Now WTF do I do with the 2 x 2.5Tb external drives I've just bought do do backups onto?
              Which version of Windows? Or does even 2k8 have this limitation?
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by eek View Post
                Tempting but I doubt you need more than 256gb even if you put all your virtual machines on it.
                My Oracle R12.1.1 VM is 298GB. My XP VM that I'm using for the current project is 149GB. Then there are a few others - it's pretty easy to burn through disk space if you try hard enough

                The hard drive I use for the Virtual Machines is 687GB full, 184GB spare.
                Best Forum Advisor 2014
                Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by PRC1964 View Post
                  512Gb is fine. I've just found out that Windows doesn't like backing up onto drives over 2Tb

                  Now WTF do I do with the 2 x 2.5Tb external drives I've just bought do do backups onto?
                  Buy a NAS enclosure for them, with RAID enabled. Set it up as a network drive and back up onto that.

                  XP Pro x64 works OK for me that way, and it recognised the 8TB Drobo drive I used to use as well.
                  Best Forum Advisor 2014
                  Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                  Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Joeman View Post
                    Why do people still backup to physical media? I keep all documents in the cloud, and my NAS drive backsup to amazon S3. Hardware requirements are low and my machines are largely disposable.
                    Primarily because above a certain volume it's neither cost effective or practical to use the cloud. I've ~1.5 to 2TB of data and vms that need backing up regularly and it's simply not feasible to use the cloud. It's also quite expensive once you get to that level, so actually cheaper to bring it in house.
                    Last edited by doodab; 25 January 2012, 12:17.
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by PRC1964 View Post
                      512Gb is fine. I've just found out that Windows doesn't like backing up onto drives over 2Tb

                      Now WTF do I do with the 2 x 2.5Tb external drives I've just bought do do backups onto?
                      You can use them for Bitcoins - I have no idea of what this is all about - something for the Geeks

                      Bitcoin: A licence to print money or useless virtual currency? | T3
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X