Have you donated to Wiki?

[TimberWolf]

I would never donate to an organisation like Wikipedia which claims to be transparent and independent, and yet has a proven history of protecting a hierarchy of insiders (some in the pay of secret service agencies) who use the site to get across their own biased point of view on controversial topics.

Emails show journalist rigged Wikipedia's naked shorts ? The Register

Spookypedia: SlimVirgin / Linda Mack and MI5

The Wikipedia Review -> General Discussion

Interesting, but that kind of thing is bound to go on with any publication IMO. Anything involving history, people, politics and world events are bound to be manipulated and biased. I assume that stuff is dubious from the start. I had more factual, cited content in mind.

[AtW]

No and no - they removed SKA entry on Wikipedia some years ago!

Then a couple of years later Jimmy's emmissar asked me if I would consider open sourcing SKA and giving it all to them

[yetanotherbob]

Wikipedia is just a parody of this