• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Poor, poor strikers go shopping

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Freamon View Post
    The main thing lacking in credibility is the Telegraph. Oh and your sincerity.
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Freamon View Post
      Clarkson is an unsecured creditor of the bankrupt insurance firm AIG. IIRC he lost most of his savings when they defaulted in 2008.
      There is actually a parallel, I think everyone lost something in the last crash, stocks went way down. The same thing will happen if the public sector costs aren´t reigned in and we end up like Greece. In fact it´ll be far worse. Pension liabilities are far higher than the banking losses.
      I'm alright Jack

      Comment


        Originally posted by pjclarke
        Taking Clarkson's 'jokes' seriously is a category error, he is primarily an entertainer, he's always been a buffoon and this latest 'outrage' just happens to come when he has a new DVD out in time for Xmas.

        He's an odd contradiction tho - the Top Gear brand and franchise that gives him a platform has been built up by the licence-payer funded BBC, you'd think - oh never mind.

        But he and the Top Gear boys are not exactly apolitical, nor honest, in their crafting of entertainment for the readership of 'Nuts' ....

        Top Dollar

        The Anti-Social Bastards in Our Midst
        George Monbiot really is a toxic bore - I can see why you would feel an attraction to his material.
        You won't be alerting anyone to anything with a mouthful of mixed seeds.

        Comment


          Yeah, he attracts a lot of abuse like that, very few of the abusers choose to engage with his arguments, though......
          My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

          Comment


            Originally posted by pjclarke
            Taking Clarkson's 'jokes' seriously is a category error, he is primarily an entertainer, he's always been a buffoon and this latest 'outrage' just happens to come when he has a new DVD out in time for Xmas.

            He's an odd contradiction tho - the Top Gear brand and franchise that gives him a platform has been built up by the licence-payer funded BBC, you'd think - oh never mind.

            But he and the Top Gear boys are not exactly apolitical, nor honest, in their crafting of entertainment for the readership of 'Nuts' ....



            Top Dollar



            The Anti-Social Bastards in Our Midst
            Clarkson and his followers are just reacting and providing a counterpoint to the often lunatic behaviour of the extreme left. It's not particularly surprising.

            Sensible people don't tend to be anywhere near either Clarkson or Mobiot on the political spectrum, rather they'll be quite a lot closer to the middle.
            "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It’s the s*** that happens while you’re waiting for moments that never come." -- Lester Freamon

            Comment


              Originally posted by Wilmslow View Post
              Striking while negotiations are taking place is insane.
              What if I told you insane was working fifty hours a week in some office for fifty years at the end of which they tell you to piss off; ending up in some retirement village hoping to die before suffering the indignity of trying to make it to the toilet on time? Wouldn't you consider that to be insane?

              Comment


                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                What if I told you insane was working fifty hours a week in some office for fifty years at the end of which they tell you to piss off; ending up in some retirement village hoping to die before suffering the indignity of trying to make it to the toilet on time? Wouldn't you consider that to be insane?
                You're back!
                "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


                Thomas Jefferson

                Comment


                  Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
                  Yeah, he attracts a lot of abuse like that, very few of the abusers choose to engage with his arguments, though......
                  Please. The guy's only borderline sane. Witness his guilt-ridden hand-wringing over the purchase of his Renault, or his hissing rage against aviation, only to admit that he indeed still takes flights to promote his books. From the "hissing rage" link:

                  ...your luxury is depriving other people of their necessities
                  Okay, so somehow my flight to Portugal is denying some kid in Angola a glass of clean drinking water. Whatever you say, man. Monbiot's probably farming a bumper crop of stomach ulcers with his pointless, impotent angst and guilt.

                  George in 2007:

                  I hope that the recession now being forecast by some economists materialises. I recognise that recession causes hardship. Like everyone I am aware that it would cause some people to lose their jobs and homes.
                  Does that include your job at the Guardian, George?

                  The Moonbat's plan to restructure society is a hoot:

                  Every citizen is given a free annual quota of carbon dioxide. He or she spends it by buying gas and electricity, petrol and train and plane tickets. If they run out, they must buy the rest from someone who has used less than his or her quota.


                  Last edited by GreenLabel; 4 December 2011, 16:23. Reason: Added much more Monbiot madness
                  You won't be alerting anyone to anything with a mouthful of mixed seeds.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by pjclarke
                    Taking Clarkson's 'jokes' seriously is a category error, he is primarily an entertainer, he's always been a buffoon and this latest 'outrage' just happens to come when he has a new DVD out in time for Xmas.

                    He's an odd contradiction tho - the Top Gear brand and franchise that gives him a platform has been built up by the licence-payer funded BBC, you'd think - oh never mind.

                    But he and the Top Gear boys are not exactly apolitical, nor honest, in their crafting of entertainment for the readership of 'Nuts' ....



                    Top Dollar



                    The Anti-Social Bastards in Our Midst
                    I thought we had got rid of all these humorless self righteous socialists. The one thing I like about Clarkson is that he rips these people apart.
                    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                    Comment


                      Monbiot has been writing for over two decades, and has occasionally written some naive and foolish things, however, from your linked article Monbiot said, in 2007

                      The only reason for which I will fly is to campaign on climate change.
                      And your link 'proving' hypocrisy was to a 2003 article, so your timeline is screwed. In fact he went on a speaking tour in Canada to erm, to campaign against climate change which seems to be the only time he has broken his self-imposed ban.

                      And that proposal is known as Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQ). It is nothing to do with social engineering, rather one possible response to the twin challenges of Peak Oil and Climate Change. You may find it a hoot, however it was given serious study by an all-party Parliamentary Committee, who concluded

                      TEQs could be the game-changer, both allowing national leaders to promise substantial reductions in fossil-fuel dependency with confidence that they will actually happen, and emboldening them to throw down the powerful challenge: “we are acting, so must you”.

                      It is now intensely urgent that nations should have an instrument, available and proven, which is capable of both reducing carbon emissions and rationing scarce fuel. The system capable of delivering that is TEQs.
                      It won't happen. My prediction is that neither this scheme, nor the alternative fast tracks to a low-carbon economy that the science tells us are needed will be adopted, partially due to the impact the noise from the denial machine has had on public perceptions. I also fear that with hindsight we will come to regret this inactivity.
                      Last edited by pjclarke; 5 December 2011, 01:11.
                      My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X