Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
£5bn is a tiny amount in terms of the debt, and I can assure you Vodaphone don't have £5bn in the bank you would have 1000's of job losses. Thats why they don't push. Economic reality I'm afraid.
UBS announced 2000 job losses to save £2bn.
Last edited by BlasterBates; 30 November 2011, 12:50.
Doubtless there are efficiencies to be made, but surely we are beyond the caricature of the feather-bedded public sector incompetent in this day and age. 73% of the public sector workforce are women, doing mostly low-paid, essential work. The Autumn Statement made cear that the Nasty Party is back. The poorest bear 16% of the brunt of new cuts and the richest only 3%, with the richest 10% untouched.
We're all in this together.
Changes to tax and benefits will drive 100,000 children back into poverty, joining the 300,000 from previous Osbourne cuts.
No doubt this is only the 'incompetent' children.
When will you socialist thickos ever get the message - THERE'S. NO. MORE. MONEY. !
I love the way Labour are now claiming that Darling would have borrowed less as if Labour were some wise financial sages who got every prediction right.
Borrowing is expected to be £79billion in 2014/15 after bringing in deep cuts.
Darling's borrowing for 2014/15 was expected to be £75billion.
Well, yes, but I could have said I expect to borrow £20 and a packet of chewing gum in 2014/15 and nobody can prove me wrong because I didn't get elected. If you honestly believe Labour would have stuck to their figure any more that the current lot then you're having a laugh.
Comment