• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Adobe kills mobile Flash, giving Steve Jobs the last laugh

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Perhaps because Flash is just a wrapper, with the video encoded using open video formats (MPEG, etc)?
    Is that a rhetorical question?
    Coffee's for closers

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
      You should tell Adobe. They obviously haven't thought this through. Or maybe - and this is just a guess - when Adobe decided to pack in Flash on mobile in favour of HTML5, it was because they'd had a good look at the situation and decided that it made more sense than carrying on with a product that didn't work and was never going to.
      They have killed it as a business (money) decision... the industry is set on HTML5 and neither iOS nor WP7 support it... not because it's "no good". If nobody will support Flash, it doesn't matter how good it is, Adobe are flogging a dead horse.

      As someone who has actually spent considerable time working in the Flex/AS3 world, I can say it is a very nice platform to develop for and very capable. But most of the web usage is for video, and Flash' most interesting functionality isn't video.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
        Is that a rhetorical question?
        More of a lazy guess. A less lazy answer would involve looking at each video format supported by YouTube and the licensing issues.

        Looks like it's a dynamic situation, with some favouring HTML5 should move to open video standards and others in favour of sticking with existing patented video formats.

        e.g.
        Controversies surrounding the H.264 video compression standard stem primarily from its use within the HTML5 Internet standard. HTML5 adds two new tags to the HTML standard: <video> and <audio> for direct embedding of video and audio content to a web page. HTML5 is being developed by the HTML5 working group as an open standard to be adopted by all web browser developers. In 2009, the HTML5 working group was split between supporters of Ogg Theora, a free video format that its developers believe is unencumbered by patents, and H.264 which contains patented technology. As late as July 2009, Google and Apple were said to support H.264, while Mozilla and Opera support Ogg Theora.[14] Microsoft, with the release of Internet Explorer 9, has added support for both HTML 5 and H.264. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer at the Gartner Symposium/ITXpo in November, 2010, in answer to the question, "HTML 5 or Silverlight?" said, "If you want to do something that is universal, there is no question the world is going HTML5."[15] However, in January 2011, Google announced that they were pulling support for H.264 from their Chrome browser and supporting both Theora and WebM/VP8 to use open formats, and provide a royalty free format for other vendors. [16]
        H.264/MPEG-4 AVC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        Comment


          #14
          The reality is those dumbfcuks @ Adobe don't know how to port Flash to ARM cpu properly.
          <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by petergriffin View Post
            The reality is those dumbfcuks @ Adobe don't know how to port Flash to ARM cpu properly.


            and with Flash and Reader high up in the vulnerabilities league, one wonders how much legacy code they have encumbered themselves with.
            Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

            Comment

            Working...
            X