Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Politically themed would you / wouldn't you thread
Collapse
X
-
I doubt it; both candidates are above the age of consent.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
-
No, she doesn't look a little bit milfyOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostCandidate number 1, the prime minister of Denmark, Helle Thorning-Schmidt. Ageing, but something milfy going on here;

Nope, she doesn't do it for me.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostCandidate number 2, Dutch Labour MP Miss Lea Bouwmeester;

Comment
-
Good. I had to find a way of stimulating thought and debate by choosing less predictable candidates than Katy Perry.Originally posted by FiveTimes View PostNo, she doesn't look a little bit milfy
Nope, she doesn't do it for me.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Ah, sorry for suggesting a candidate that makes even KP look a little dull.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostGood. I had to find a way of stimulating thought and debate by choosing less predictable candidates than Katy Perry.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
-
It would be a shorter list to ask who wouldn't Berlusconi do.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostBerlusconi wouldNever has a man been heard to say on his death bed that he wishes he'd spent more time in the office.Comment
-
I think I would but I might have to find a better picture. Has she got a decent rack ?Originally posted by Bunk View PostWhat about Louise Mensch?

I think I probably would.Comment
-
Nah, I wouldntOriginally posted by FiveTimes View PostI think I would but I might have to find a better picture. Has she got a decent rack ?Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47


Comment