• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Politically themed would you / wouldn't you thread

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Berlusconi would
    I doubt it; both candidates are above the age of consent.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #12


      Alina Kabaeva

      No need to answer...
      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

      Comment


        #13
        Would it help if I just changed my sig to "Yes, yes I would"

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Candidate number 1, the prime minister of Denmark, Helle Thorning-Schmidt. Ageing, but something milfy going on here;


          No, she doesn't look a little bit milfy

          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Candidate number 2, Dutch Labour MP Miss Lea Bouwmeester;

          Nope, she doesn't do it for me.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
            No, she doesn't look a little bit milfy



            Nope, she doesn't do it for me.
            Good. I had to find a way of stimulating thought and debate by choosing less predictable candidates than Katy Perry.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Good. I had to find a way of stimulating thought and debate by choosing less predictable candidates than Katy Perry.
              Ah, sorry for suggesting a candidate that makes even KP look a little dull.
              Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

              Comment


                #17
                What about Louise Mensch?



                I think I probably would.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  Berlusconi would
                  It would be a shorter list to ask who wouldn't Berlusconi do.
                  Never has a man been heard to say on his death bed that he wishes he'd spent more time in the office.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
                    What about Louise Mensch?



                    I think I probably would.
                    I think I would but I might have to find a better picture. Has she got a decent rack ?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
                      I think I would but I might have to find a better picture. Has she got a decent rack ?
                      Nah, I wouldnt
                      Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
                      +5 Xeno Cool Points

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X