- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part one.
Collapse
X
-
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part one.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
me to
although why celebrities think their being clever wondering about in their Y fronts and wrinkly tights is beyond me -
She would have to be a lot bigger than that for me to turn her down.Just saying like.
where there's chaos, there's cash !
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!
Lowering the tone since 1963Comment
-
I find it hard to believe it's the same person that was getting all dirrrrrty a few years ago. Looks like some women really do let themselves go when kids come along.
I used to prefer her over Britney but these days Britney appears to have the upper hand.
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
-
Would you reconsider if you're allowed to stick something in her mouth to shut her up?Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo. But nothing to do with weight (or not).And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostI find it hard to believe it's the same person that was getting all dirrrrrty a few years ago. Looks like some women really do let themselves go when kids come along.
I used to prefer her over Britney but these days Britney appears to have the upper hand.
I would though
for honesty!
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I wouldn't eitherOriginally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo. But nothing to do with weight (or not).
She bares an uncanny (and unwanted) resemblance to someone I used to knowCoffee's for closersComment
-
-
and used to do?Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostI wouldn't either
She bares an uncanny (and unwanted) resemblance to someone I used to knowAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29

Comment