- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part one.
Collapse
X
-
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part one.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
me to
although why celebrities think their being clever wondering about in their Y fronts and wrinkly tights is beyond me -
She would have to be a lot bigger than that for me to turn her down.Just saying like.
where there's chaos, there's cash !
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!
Lowering the tone since 1963Comment
-
I find it hard to believe it's the same person that was getting all dirrrrrty a few years ago. Looks like some women really do let themselves go when kids come along.
I used to prefer her over Britney but these days Britney appears to have the upper hand.
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
-
Would you reconsider if you're allowed to stick something in her mouth to shut her up?Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo. But nothing to do with weight (or not).And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostI find it hard to believe it's the same person that was getting all dirrrrrty a few years ago. Looks like some women really do let themselves go when kids come along.
I used to prefer her over Britney but these days Britney appears to have the upper hand.
I would though
for honesty!
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I wouldn't eitherOriginally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo. But nothing to do with weight (or not).
She bares an uncanny (and unwanted) resemblance to someone I used to knowCoffee's for closersComment
-
-
and used to do?Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostI wouldn't either
She bares an uncanny (and unwanted) resemblance to someone I used to knowAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18

Comment