- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part one.
Collapse
X
-
Daily Mail would you/wouldn't you thread part one.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
me to
although why celebrities think their being clever wondering about in their Y fronts and wrinkly tights is beyond me -
She would have to be a lot bigger than that for me to turn her down.Just saying like.
where there's chaos, there's cash !
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!
Lowering the tone since 1963Comment
-
I find it hard to believe it's the same person that was getting all dirrrrrty a few years ago. Looks like some women really do let themselves go when kids come along.
I used to prefer her over Britney but these days Britney appears to have the upper hand.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo. But nothing to do with weight (or not).And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostI find it hard to believe it's the same person that was getting all dirrrrrty a few years ago. Looks like some women really do let themselves go when kids come along.
I used to prefer her over Britney but these days Britney appears to have the upper hand.
I would thoughfor honesty!
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo. But nothing to do with weight (or not).
She bares an uncanny (and unwanted) resemblance to someone I used to knowCoffee's for closersComment
-
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostI wouldn't either
She bares an uncanny (and unwanted) resemblance to someone I used to knowAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Today 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Comment