• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Work harder you idle Western bastards!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    The difference between us and China is purely one of land mass.

    We bustle our old people off to stinking care homes paid for by the state & forget about them while they have extended families and treat their elders with respect.
    ftfy
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      The difference between us and China is purely one of land mass.

      We have to care for our old and sick as we don't have enough space in which to bury them.
      We put them in one bed apartments and occasionally a nurse may or may not visit to see if they've fallen/frozen/starved, all for £900 a week.

      What's wrong with the 'Golden Girls' approach? Put 'em in a house 4 or 5 at a time and get a live in carer, more civilised and much more cost effective.

      (I heard this on the Radio about 3 years ago, makes good sense to me)
      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
        We put them in one bed apartments and occasionally a nurse may or may not visit to see if they've fallen/frozen/starved, all for £900 a week.

        What's wrong with the 'Golden Girls' approach? Put 'em in a house 4 or 5 at a time and get a live in carer, more civilised and much more cost effective.

        (I heard this on the Radio about 3 years ago, makes good sense to me)
        Or put them in a house 10-12 at a time and let them huddle together for warmth.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #14
          Truth is SO hurt!!! The main point is the welfare system is linking to motivation to work. Having read some comments here, some people refused to believe what Mr. Jin said and defended by how bad China behave!!! However, if some /many people prefer to live on benefits by having number of kids at young age, then, we do not have any way out from recession. If this kind of speech was delivered by Mr Cameron or Miliband, I am wondering what will the feedback like??? - me, uk, 20/10/2011 14:40

          Hopefully the feedback would be somewhat more intelligible than this.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment

          Working...
          X